Skip to main content

Elana J. Fertig, PhD

Dean E. Albert Reece, MD, PhD, MBA Endowed Professor

Academic Title:

Professor

Primary Appointment:

Medicine

Administrative Title:

Director of the Institute of Genome Science (IGS); Associate Director for Quantitative Science in the Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center (UMGCCC)

Phone (Primary):

410-706-2813

Phone (Secondary):

410-706-2396

Fax:

410-706-6777

Education and Training

B.S., Physics and Mathematics, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA

M.S., Applied Mathematics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD

PhD, Applied Mathematics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD

Biosketch

Dr. Fertig advances a new predictive medicine paradigm for oncology by converging systems biology with multi-omics technology development. Her computational cancer biology research is inspired by her background as a NASA fellow in weather prediction. She aims to invent computational techniques that blend multi-platform high-throughput with mechanistic mathematical modeling and artificial intelligence methods to forecast the cellular and molecular pathways of tumor progression and therapeutic response over time. Her combined expertise in computational oncology, chaos theory, nonlinear dynamics, and tumor immunotherapy ensures translational relevance and mechanistic validation of computational findings. Dr. Fertig has been a leader in establishing spatial multi-omics technologies, matrix factorization, and transfer learning as current mainstays in bioinformatics. Beyond algorithm development, Dr. Fertig’s transdisciplinary expertise enables her to lead large-scale, team-science projects, adapting cutting-edge molecular profiling technologies to human biospecimen research and clinical trials to uncover new therapeutic interception pathways. Beyond the lab, she is a recognized leader in developing new training paradigms that converge oncologists, pathologists, basic biologists, computational investigators, and engineers to advance the next generation of computationally-driven cancer research.

In December, 2024 Dr. Fertig was named the Director of the Institute for Genome Sciences and the Dean E. Albert Reece Endowed Professor in the School of Medicine at the University of Maryland School of Medicine after a nationwide search; and Associate Cancer Center Director of Quantitative Sciences at the University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of Maryland, Baltimore. Prior to joining the faculty of the University of Maryland, she was a Professor of Oncology and Division and Associate Cancer Center Director in Quantitative Sciences and Co-Director of the Convergence Institute at Johns Hopkins University. Prior to entering the field of computational cancer biology, Dr Fertig was a NASA research fellow in numerical weather prediction as a graduate student in Applied Mathematics and Scientific Computation at University of Maryland, College Park. Dr. Fertig’s research is featured in over numerous peer-reviewed publications, open-source software packages, and competitive funding portfolio as PI and co-I. She was elected to the College of Fellows American Institute for Medical and Biomedical Engineering (AIMBE) in 2022, serves on the editorial boards of Genome Medicine, Cell Systems, Clinical Cancer Research, and Cancer Research Communications, and as co-chair of the AACR Data Science Task Force.

Watch the Video: Get to Know: Dr. Fertig

Research/Clinical Keywords

computational cancer biology research

Highlighted Publications

Johnson JAI, Bergman DR, Rocha HL, Zhou DL, Cramer E, Mclean IC, Dance YW, Booth M, Nicholas Z, Lopez-Vidal T, Deshpande A, Heiland R, Bucher E, Shojaeian F, Dunworth M, Forjaz A, Getz M, Godet I, Kurtoglu F, Lyman M, Metzcar J, Mitchell JT, Raddatz A, Solorzano J, Sundus A, Wang Y, DeNardo DG, Ewald AJ, Gilkes DM, Kagohara LT, Kiemen AL, Thompson ED, Wirtz D, Wood LD, Wu PH, Zaidi N, Zheng L, Zimmerman JW, Phillip JM, Jaffee EM, Gray JW, Coussens LM, Chang YH, Heiser LM, Stein-O'Brien GL, Fertig EJ, Macklin P. Human interpretable grammar encodes multicellular systems biology models to democratize virtual cell laboratories. Cell. 2025 Aug 21;188(17):4711-4733.e37. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2025.06.048. Epub 2025 Jul 26. PMID: 40713951. Stein-O'Brien GL et al. Decomposing Cell Identity for Transfer Learning across Cellular Measurements, Platforms, Tissues, and Species. Cell Syst. 2019;8(5):395-411.e8. PMC6588402.

Sharma G et al. projectR: an R/Bioconductor package for transfer learning via PCA, NMF, correlation and clustering. Bioinformatics. 2020;36(11):3592-3593. PMC7267840.

Davis-Marcisak EF et al. Transfer learning between preclinical models and human tumors identifies a conserved NK cell activation signature in anti-CTLA-4 responsive tumors. Genome Medicine. 2021;13(1):129. PMC8356429.

Johnson J et al. Inferring cellular and molecular processes in single-cell data with non-negative matrix factorization using Python, R, and GenePattern Notebook implementations of CoGAPS. Nature Protocols. In press, PMCID in progress. Preprint: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.09.499398.

Additional Publication Citations

Complete List of Published Work in MyBibliography.

Research Interests

Grants and Contracts

Ongoing and recently completed projects that I would like to highlight include:

U01CA271273
Interrogation of the Impact of Selection on the Evolution of Human PancreaticCancer Precursor Lesions
12/16/2024 – 08/31/2027 Wood, Fertig, Karchin (MPI) Role: PI

U54CA274371
Tumor Microenvironment Crosstalk Drives Early Lesions in Pancreatic Cancer
12/16/24 – 08/31/27 Maitra and Pasca Di Magliano (MPI) Role: Core Director

U01CA294548
An atlas of pancreatic tumorigenesis in the context of altered DNA repair occurring in high-risk individuals
12/16/2024 – 8/31/2029 Sears, Fertig, Wood, Brody (MPI) Role: PI

National Foundation for Cancer Research
Multi-Omics Analysis of Immune Therapy Responses in Mammary Carcinoma
12/16/24 – 3/31/2026 Coussens, Fertig (MPI) Role: PI

U24CA284156
Informing mechanistic rules of agent-based models with single-cell multi-omics
09/01/2024-08/31/2029 Macklin, Fertig (MPI), Role: PI

Break Through Cancer
Data Science Hub
3/1/2022 – 2/28/2025 Fertig(PI) Role: PI

In the News

Computational Model Predicts Tissue-Specific Cell Activity Over Time

Jul 28, 2025 | Forest Ray

NEW YORK – A new computational modeling method uses plain language to write its own code for predicting cellular activity over time and generating testable hypotheses.

The computational framework, called "cell behavior hypothesis grammar," is an application of a computational method called agent-based modeling. The method could open doors to creating complex simulations of cellular systems for precision cancer research, an application that its creators hope to advance. It was published late Friday in the journal Cell.

Agent-based modeling (ABM) is a computational modeling technique used to understand system behavior by analyzing the interactions of autonomous programs, or "agents," each of which obeys its own set of rules. In this case, the agents model individual cells whose behavioral rules are derived from prior multiomic research.

Paul Macklin, professor of intelligence systems engineering at Indiana University and one of the paper's corresponding authors, described ABM as a powerful tool for studying dynamic biological systems but one that has so far been somewhat unapproachable for many biologists without strong computational backgrounds.

"Ten years ago, as a brand new computational system, it was very [computer science] heavy," he said. "It was very hard to use, you had to program everything by hand in C++, and it was very difficult to build reusable models in particular and to train new people to use it."

To make ABM more approachable, Macklin and his colleagues programmed cell-type specific agents with reference behavior models that simulate key processes such as cell division, growth, death, migration, secreting chemical factors, and differentiation.

"We make this big palette of behaviors that are already built in under the hood, and each of those has been calibrated to prior experiments," Macklin said.

Key to the model is a plain language interface –– the "behavior hypothesis grammar" –– that takes inputs such as "oxygen decreases necrosis" and connects those behaviors to signals the cells see in their simulated environment, such as drugs and signaling factors.

"We can go out and make more detailed models, but this language gives us a way to shortcut around that, saying [that] if you have an observation from prior analysis or observation, you can create rules that relate a change in cell behavior to something that we see in our simulated environment," Macklin said.

As the wealth of knowledge in the scientific community improves, he continued, more rules can be added to give a more complete picture of how cells act.

The investigators used this framework to model immune processes such as macrophage plasticity, T-cell activation and expansion, antigen recognition, and inflammation through a series of virtual experiments that Macklin and his colleagues said could eventually lead to the creation of digital twins, which could aid clinicians in better personalizing cancer therapies.

The team used real-world genomics data from breast cancer patients to reproduce the tumor-promoting behavior that often arises during an immune response then adapted that modeling framework to simulate an immunotherapy trial in a pancreatic cancer setting.

Working with data from untreated pancreatic cancer tissue samples, the model predicted an array of responses that each virtual patient might have to various immune-targeted therapies. These therapies comprised Bristol Myers Squibb's (BMS) anti-CD137 agonist therapy urelumab, the allogeneic pancreatic cancer vaccine GVAX, and BMS's anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor Opdivo (nivolumab).

While a combination of the three drugs converted the most simulated T cells to an optimal killing state, single or double combinations outperformed the triple combination for several tissue models, suggesting a new biological hypothesis that macrophage clearing of tumor cells is essential for lymphocyte trafficking and tumor cell killing in PDAC. The authors commented in their study that this hypothesis is consistent with clinical observations of increased TREM2+ macrophage signaling to tumor cells in response to the triple combination.

Finally, the team demonstrated the generalizability of their modeling method to systems beyond cancer by simulating the formation of tissue layers in brain development. By fitting rule parameters to datasets representative of the endpoint of the simulation when the brain regions have fully formed, they successfully reproduced the laminar structure of both the somatosensory and auditory cortices.

Elana Fertig, director of the Institute for Genome Sciences at the University of Maryland and one of the study's coauthors, said that she and her coauthors are now working to expand their findings to the precancer space and see if they can extend those to other cell types to figure out which lesions are more likely to grow, relative to the lesions that are more likely to be controlled naturally by the immune system.

Laura Heiser, professor of biomedical engineering at Oregon Health and Science University and another of the study's coauthors, said that she is excited to carry the results of this study forward to explore more aspects of breast cancer.

"I've become quite interested in understanding the role of the macrophage population in mediating tumor progression and also as a population of cells that may be co-opted therapeutically to reduce tumor outgrowth and provide therapeutic endpoints," Heiser said.

Fertig also commented that computational biology is experiencing a broad move towards predicting perturbations from virtual cells via artificial intelligence (AI) and that the new cell behavior hypothesis grammar provides a better approach for modeling more complex behaviors that arise from multiple cellular interactions.

"Predicting perturbations from virtual cells … is not mechanistic," Fertig said. "You don't necessarily know what happened in that perturbation, but even if you did, [the AI] considers each cell in isolation, whereas all these ecosystems are multicellular, and none of the AI approaches account for that."

Fertig said that this obstacle for AI stems from a lack of training data for all these cellular interactions.

"Even thinking about how you would generate training data of all the different cell-cell combinations and perturbations," she said, "it becomes a combinatorial impossibility in terms of the amount of data that would be needed for AI."

Another key advantage of the cell behavior hypothesis grammar may be the ability to see precisely which parameters within the model drive the observed results.

"The beauty of mechanistic modeling is that it's explainable," Macklin said. "Machine language starts being written in a human readable format and then put into a model, rather than just [being] a black box, which makes it a lot more interpretable."

Although the simulations carried out in the current study were all modeled in two dimensions, Macklin said that the team has been working to expand their modeling capabilities into three dimensions, initially working with the pancreatic cancer model they developed for this study.

"We took that 2D [model], made a 3D tumor sphere [with] the immune cells' initial conditions, left everything else alone, and the same predictions came out," Macklin said. "This is the kind of science that really comes about when you allow people to develop and have some creativity and then come together as a team."