University of Maryland School of Medicine logo
Emergency Medicine
All Departments
UMSOM Assistant
UMEM Educational Pearls
  • Home
  • Departments
  • Emergency Medicine
  • CME
  • UMEM Educational Pearls
  • CME
  • Courses and Conferences
  • Free Open Access Medical Education
  • UMEM Educational Pearls

Search

601-620 of 879 results with category "Critical Care"

Previous  |  1 |  ... |  26 |  27 |  28 |  29 |  30 |  31 |  32 |  33 |  34 |  35 |  36 |  ... |  44 |  Next

Title: Labs in Anaphylaxis

Category: Critical Care

Keywords: anaphylaxis, tryptase, diagnosis (PubMed Search)

Posted: 12/6/2012 by Ellen Lemkin, MD, PharmD (Updated: 7/21/2026)

  • Serum total tryptase measurements may be useful for confirmation of venom or drug induced anaphylaxis (not as useful for food induced)
  • Can send serial tryptase levels at the time of presentation, 1-2 hours later, and at resolution
  • This is NOT helpful for confirmation at the time of the episode, as it takes several hours to perform

Show References

Simons EF, Ardusso LE, Bilo MB, et al. 2012 Update: World Allergy Organization Guidelines for the assessment and management of anaphylaxis.



Title: Management of AKI

Category: Critical Care

Posted: 11/27/2012 by Mike Winters, MBA, MD (Updated: 7/21/2026)

Managing Critically Ill Patients with AKI

  • Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurs in almost 50% of hospitalized patients and is an independent risk factor for mortality. 
  • Updated guidelines have recently been published on the management of patients with AKI.
  • Pearls for the management of patients with, or at risk of, AKI include:
    • Optimize volume status and perfusion pressure
      • Crystalloids preferred over colloids
      • Consider vasopressors to maintain MAP > 65 mm Hg
    • Avoid nephrotoxic drugs
    • Control co-factors
      • Monitor intra-abdominal pressure
      • Avoid hyperglycemia - target glucose < 150 mg/dL

Show References

Brienza N, et al. Protocoled resuscitation and the prevention of acute kidney injury. Curr Opin Crit Care 2012; 18:613-622.

Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Acute Kidney Injury Work Group. KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Kidney Injury. Kidney Int 2012; 2(S):1-138.



Title: How Low, Should You Go?

Category: Critical Care

Posted: 11/20/2012 by Haney Mallemat, MD

A low-tidal volume (or protective) strategy of mechanical ventilation (i.e., tidal volume of 6-8cc/kg of ideal body weight) has previously been demonstrated to be beneficial in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

A meta-analysis was recently performed to determine whether this strategy of mechanical ventilation is also beneficial for patients without lung injury prior to initiation of mechanical ventilation.

Dr. Neto, et al. performed a meta-analysis of 20 studies (total of 2,822 mechanically ventilated patients) comparing a conventional ventilation strategy (average tidal volume was 10.6 cc/kg) to a protective ventilation strategy (average tidal volume was 6.4 cc/kg) of mechanical ventilation.

The authors concluded that patients ventilated with a protective lung-strategy had reductions in:

  • Mortality
  • Lung injury and ARDS
  • Atelectasis
  • Pulmonary infections          
  • Length of hospital stay

Bottom-line: This meta-analysis supports the notion that a strategy of low-tidal volume ventilation may have benefits for patients without ARDS, however prospective studies are needed.

Show References

Neto, S. et al. Association between use of lung-protective ventilation with lower tidal volumes and clinical outcomes among patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome. JAMA, Oct. 24/31; 308;16.

Follow me on Twitter (@criticalcarenow) or Google+ (+haney mallemat)



Title: Antibiotic Dosing for Burn Patients

Category: Critical Care

Posted: 11/13/2012 by Mike Winters, MBA, MD

Burn Patients and Antibiotic Dosing

  • Burn patients have a number of abnormalities in the early postinjury phase that can significantly impact the efficacy of antimicrobial therapy.  These include hypovolemia, hypoalbuminemia, and increasing GFR.
  • A few pearls when dosing select antibiotics in burn patients:
    • Aminoglycosides: in the absence of renal impairment, consider more frequent dosing to achieve adequate concentrations.
    • Beta-lactams: typical doses often don't reach effective concentrations; increase the dose, frequency of administration, or duration of infusion.
    • Vancomycin: the typical dose of 1 gm is usually ineffective; use a larger loading dose (15-20 mg/kg).
    • Linezolid: standard doses are usually ineffective; use a higher initial dose.

Show References

Jamal JA, et al. Improving antibiotic dosing in special situations in the ICU: burns, renal replacement therapy and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Curr Opin Crit Care 2012; 18:460-71.



Title: Too much salt may NOT be sweet.

Category: Critical Care

Posted: 11/6/2012 by Haney Mallemat, MD

Previous pearls have described the increasing evidence against colloid (e.g., hydroxyethyl starch) use during resuscitation. Now it appears that the crystalloid 0.9% normal saline (NS) may be under fire. 

The use of large volumes of NS has been associated with hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis and harm in animal studies. The risk of harm in humans, however, has been less clear. 

Bellomo et al. conducted a prospective observational study in which patients being resuscitated in the control group received NS at the clinicians' discretion; i.e., chloride-liberal strategy. The use of NS was restricted in the intervention group, where other less chloride containing fluids were used for resuscitation (e.g., Ringer's Lactate); i.e., a chloride-restrictive strategy. 

The authors found that when compared to patients in the chloride-liberal group, the chloride-restrictive group had significantly less rise in baseline creatinine, less overall AKI, and a reduced need for renal replacement therapy.

Bottom line: Although this was only an observational study, the liberal use of normal saline during resuscitation may increase the risk of AKI and renal replacement therapy. 

Show References

Bellomo, R. et al. Association between a chloride-liberal vs. chloride-restrictive intravenous fluid administration strategy and kidney injury in critically ill adults. JAMA. 2012 Oct 17;308(15):1566-72. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.13356.

Follow me on Twitter (@criticalcarenow) and Google+ (+haney mallemat)

 



Title: Serotonin Toxicity

Category: Critical Care

Posted: 10/30/2012 by Mike Winters, MBA, MD (Updated: 7/21/2026)

Serotonin Toxicity in the Critically Ill

  • Serotonin toxicity (aka serotonin syndrome) can easily be overlooked and misdiagnosed in many of our critically ill patients.
  • Several common ED medications are associated with serotonin toxicity and include tramadol, linezolid, ondansetron, and metoclopramide.
  • Clues to the diagnosis include hyperthermia, increased muscle tone, hyperreflexia, dilated pupils and clonus.  Of these, clonus is the most sensitive and specific sign.
  • A few important treatment pearls:
    • Avoid physical restraints
    • Consider cyproheptadine: only available in PO form; initial dose is 12 mg
    • Avoid dopamine for those that need vasopressors
    • Avoid bromocriptine and dantrolene

Show References

Bienvenu OJ, Neufeld KJ, Needham DM. Treatment of four psychiatric emergencies in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2012; 40:2662-2670.



Title: Sugar isn't always so sweet

Category: Critical Care

Posted: 10/24/2012 by Haney Mallemat, MD (Updated: 10/24/2012)

A study by Perner, et al recently published in NEJM observed that using hydroxyethyl starch (HES) as a resuscitation fluid increased mortality and renal replacement therapy at 90 days as compared to lactated acetate.
 
Another recent trial, called the “Crystalloid versus Hydroxyethyl Starch Trial” (CHEST) was a prospective randomized control trial from Australia comparing the use of 6% HES and 0.9% sodium chloride as a resuscitation fluid in the critically ill. 
 
With 7,000 patients enrolled (3,500 in each group), the CHEST trial is the largest single-trial of HES to date; the primary outcome was 90-day mortality and secondary outcomes were acute kidney injury (AKI) and renal-replacement therapy
 
The study concluded that there was no difference between groups for either morality or renal failure, but significantly more patients in the HES group required renal replacement therapy.
 
Bottom line: There is still no convincing data that patients receiving HES as part of their resuscitation have better outcomes compared to crystalloid (normal saline or lactated ringers) and there is increased harm with their use. Furthermore, the increased cost of HES does not appear to justify their routine use.

Show References

Perner A., et al. Hydroxyethyl Starch 130/0.4 versus Ringer's Acetate in Severe Sepsis. NEJM. 2012 Jun 27.

 
MyBurgh, J. Hydroxyethyl Starch or Saline for Fluid Resuscitation in Intensive Care. N Engl J Med. 2012 Oct 17.
 
Follow me on twitter (@criticalcarenow) or Google+ (+haney mallemat) 


Title: Delirium in the Critically Ill

Category: Critical Care

Posted: 10/16/2012 by Mike Winters, MBA, MD (Updated: 7/21/2026)

Delirium in the Critically Ill

  • Delirium has been shown to be an independent predictor of mortality and can occur in up to 75% of critically ill patients.
  • Whether preventing or treating delirium in the critically ill patient, consider the following:
    • Minimize the use of anticholinergic medications (i.e. diphenhydramine, chlorpromazine)
    • Ensure pain is adequately controlled (avoid meperidine and tramadol)
    • Be careful with sedative medications; consider bolus dosing and daily interruption of continuous infusions
  • Additional measures to treat delirious patients include reducing sensory deprivation, promoting normal sleep-wake cycles, early physical rehabilitation, and treating psychosis.

Show References

Bienvenu OJ, Neufeld KJ, Needham DM. Treatment of four psychiatric emergencies in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2012; 40:2662-2670.



Title: What's the Diagnosis? Critical Care Edition

Category: Critical Care

Posted: 10/9/2012 by Haney Mallemat, MD

Question

70 year-old male recently treated for community-acquired pneumonia presents with bloody diarrhea, fever, and severe abdominal pain. Abdominal Xray is shown below. Diagnosis?  

Show Answer

Answer: Toxic Megacolon

Toxic megacolon (TM) is an acute colitis with segmental or total colonic dilation (>6cm) plus systemic toxicity.

Actual incidence is unknown, but it is believed that TM is rising because of increasing cases of Clostridium difficile and the aging population. 

The most common etiologies are ulcerative, chron, and pseudomembranous colitis, but other causes exist and can be categorized as:

  • Inflammatory (e.g., ulcerative colitis, Behcet's disease, etc.)
  • Infectious (e.g., Clostridium difficile, Salmonella, Shigella, CMV, etc.)
  • Ischemia  
  • Miscellaneous (chemotherapy, Kaposi sarcoma, etc.)

The diagnosis is made based on clinical evidence of colitis plus evidence of colonic dilation on abdominal XR (diameter > 6cm, loss of haustra, or free intraperitoneal air secondary to perforation) or CT scan (demonstrating dilation or perforation).

Treatment includes:

  • Aggressive fluid resuscitation and vasopressors/inotropes.
  • Broad-spectrum antibiotics
  • NPO, NG tube for bowel decompression, and avoiding medications reducing GI motility (e.g., narcotics)
  • Early surgical evaluation is required although definitive surgical care (including colectomy) may be delayed for up to 3 days while monitoring the response to conservative treatment.

Show References

Autenrieth, D et al. Toxic Megacolon Inflammatory Bowel Dis. 2011 Aug 29. 

Follow me on Twitter (@criticalcarenow) or Google+ (+haney mallemat)



Title: TTP

Category: Critical Care

Posted: 10/2/2012 by Mike Winters, MBA, MD (Updated: 7/21/2026)

Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (TTP)

  • TTP is a true hematologic emergency.  As a result of delays in diagnosis and initiation of treatment, mortality remains around 20%.
  • Often, patients present with nonspecific symptoms that include weakness, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea.
  • Recall that the textbook pentad is rarely present upon presentation.  In fact, renal failure and neurologic deficits are late findings.
  • Plasma exchange remains the treatment of choice for critically ill ED patients with TTP.
  • If plasma exchange is not immediately available, consider FFP (15-30 ml/kg) and methylprednisolone (10 mg/kg).

Show References

Kessler CS, et al. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: A hematological emergency. J Emerg Med 2012; 43:538-44.



Title: Does a cuff-leak mean anything?

Category: Critical Care

Posted: 9/25/2012 by Haney Mallemat, MD

Intubated patients may occasionally meet certain criteria for extubation while in the Emergency Department. Extubation is not without its risk, however, as up to 30% of patients have respiratory distress secondary to laryngeal and upper airway edema, with some patients requiring re-intubation.

Prior to extubation, Intensivists use a brief “cuff-leak” test (deflation of the endotracheal balloon to assess the presence or absence of an air-leak around the tube) to indirectly screen for the presence of upper airway edema and ultimately the risk of re-intubation. The cuff-leak test is performed by deflating the endotracheal balloon followed by one or more of the following maneuvers:

  • Using the ventilator to measure the difference between inspired and expired tidal volumes; if there is a difference in the measured volumes, then air is “leaking” around the endotracheal tube, implying minimal airway edema.
  • Auscultation for an air “leak” around the tube during mechanical ventilation; auscultation of a leak implies that air is passing around the tube and minimal airway edema is present.
  • Disconnecting the patient from the ventilator and occluding the endotracheal tube during spontaneous breathing; auscultation of a leak implies that there is air passing around the tube and minimal airway edema is present.

Ochoa et al. performed a systematic review to determine the accuracy of the “cuff-leak” test to predict upper airway edema prior to extubation. The authors concluded that a positive cuff-leak test (i.e., absence of an air-leak) indicates an elevated risk of upper airway obstruction and re-intubation. A negative cuff-leak test (i.e., presence of an air-leak), however, does not reliably exclude the presence of upper airway edema or the need for subsequent re-intubation.

Bottom line: No test prior to extubation reliably predicts the absence of upper airway edema. Patients extubated in the Emergency Department require close observation with airway equipment located nearby.

 

Show References

Ochoa, ME et al. Cuff-leak test for the diagnosis of upper airway obstruction in adults: A systematic review
and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med (2009) 35:1171–1179

Follow me on Twitter @criticalcarenow or Google+ (+Haney Mallemat)



Title: Lung Transplant Pt.

Category: Critical Care

Posted: 9/18/2012 by Mike Winters, MBA, MD

The Lung Transplant Patient in Your ED

  • The number of lung transplant recipients is increasing.  With improved immunosuppressant medications, pts are living longer.  In fact, the 5-yr survival rate is now approximately 60%.
  • When evaluating a lung transplant pt who is < 1 yr following transplant, think about acute rejection and infection
  • Acute rejection occurs in up to 40% of pts, can present with cough, SOB, malaise, or hypoxia, and is treated with high-dose corticosteroids.
  • Infection
    • Bacterial infections usually occur in the early stages following transplant, with Pseudomonas the predominant organism
    • CMV is the most common organism affecting up to 33% of pts during the first year after transplant

Show References

Fuehner T, et al. The lung transplant patient in the ICU. Curr Opin Crit Care 2012; 18:472-8.



Title: Non-Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema

Category: Critical Care

Posted: 9/11/2012 by Haney Mallemat, MD

Question

40 year-old male with severe uncontrolled hypertension presents with altered mental status (head CT below). The CXR is from the same patient. What's the connection?

Show Answer

Answer: Neurogenic pulmonary edema (NPE)

NPE is defined as acute pulmonary edema following central nervous system (CNS) insult; NPE has been recognized for over 100 years, but its incidence is underreported due to a lack objective clinical criteria. 

The pathophysiology of NPE is poorly understood but it is generally believed that both cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema play a role. CXR (see above) demonstrates a pattern similar to acute respiratory distress syndrome (i.e., bilateral interstitial infiltrates). 

CNS insults that are abrupt, rapidly progressive, and increase intracranial pressure (e.g., subarachnoid hemorrhage, intraparenchymal hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury, subdural, etc.) have the highest risk for NPE. Neural injury leads to sympathetic activation, the release of catecholamines, and one or all of the following:

  • Direct myocardial injury and cardiac dysfunction
  • Increased systemic afterload causing left ventricular dysfunction
  • Increased pulmonary vascular permeability and leak 

Treatment of NPE includes:

  • Reversing and treating the underlying disorder
  • Supplemental oxygen with positive pressure ventilation as necessary
  • Low-tidal volume  ventilation (if mechanically ventilated) with appropriate PEEP
  • Cautious use of diuretics, as adequate intravascular volume is needed for cerebral perfusion
  • Specific pharmacologic measures (eg. alpha blockers) have been studied but their efficacy is unclear and are not recommended as symptoms typically resolve within 72 hours

Show References

Davidson, D. et al. Neurogenic pulmonary edema. Crit Care. 2012 Mar 20;16(2):212.

Follow me on Twitter (@criticalcarenow) and Google+ (+haneymallemat)



Title: Right Heart Failure in the Critically Ill

Category: Critical Care

Posted: 9/4/2012 by Mike Winters, MBA, MD (Updated: 7/21/2026)

Right Heart Failure in the Critically Ill

  • In its most simplistic form, right heart failure (RHF) is due to either to right ventricular contractile dysfunction or elevated right ventricular afterload.
    • Primary causes of RV contractile dysfunction include: coronary ischemia, sepsis, drug toxicity, and acute pulmonary hypertension
    • Primary causes of increased RV afterload include: LV dysfunction, venous thromboembolism, hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction, and lung injury
  • Management of the patient with RHF centers on identifying and treating reversible causes, optimizing preload, inotropes, and possible implantation of a right ventricular assist device.
  • Importantly, excessive volume loading can worsen RV contractile function, increase RV dilatation, and impair LV output and systemic perfusion.
  • Consider early use of inotropic agents, such as dobutamine, in critically ill patients with RHF.

Show References

Greyson CR. Right heart failure in the intensive care unit. Curr Opin Crit Care 2012; 18:424-31.



Title: What's the paralytic of choice during rapid sequence intubation?

Category: Critical Care

Posted: 8/28/2012 by Haney Mallemat, MD

A Cochrane review of 37 studies concluded that Succinylcholine (SUC) is superior to Rocuronium (ROC) during rapid sequence intubation.

The authors claim that compared to ROC, SUC has a faster onset of action (45 vs. 60 seconds) and overall a shorter duration of action (10 vs. 60 minutes).

Dr. Reuben Strayer wrote a letter to the journal editors and stated that these findings should be interpreted carefully; he highlighted that most of the studies in the review used doses of ROC less than 0.9 mg/kg (most studies used 0.6mg/kg).

Dr. Strayer asserted that ROC’s onset of action is dose dependent; when using doses of 1.2 mg/kg, ROC’s onset is indistinguishable from that of SUC. He also stated another major benefit of ROC is the lack of adverse effects that SUC possesses (hyperkalemia and malignant hyperthermia).

What are your thoughts on this? Go to http://www.facebook.com/Criticalcarenow and take the poll (there are 5 choices). Results will be posted next week.

Show References

Seupaul RA, Jones JH. Evidence-based emergency medicine. Does succinylcholine maximize intubating conditions better than rocuronium for rapid sequence intubation? Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Mar;57(3):301-2. Epub 2010 Nov 18.

Strayer RJ. Rocuronium versus succinylcholine: Cochrane synopsis reconsidered. Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Aug;58(2):217-8.

Follow me on Twitter (@criticalcarenow) and Google+ (+haney mallemat)

 



Title: Fluids and AKI

Category: Critical Care

Posted: 8/21/2012 by Mike Winters, MBA, MD (Updated: 7/21/2026)

AKI and Fluid Balance

  • Up to 70% of critically ill patients develop acute kidney injury (AKI), with 5-6% of ICU patients requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT). 
  • Maintaining adequate renal perfusion is central to the management of AKI in the critically ill patient.  As such, fluids are frequently administered.
  • As we've highlighted in previous pearls, there is mounting evidence to indicate that a positive fluid balance may be detrimental for select critically ill patients.
  • Results from a recent publication suggest a positive fluid balance in patients with AKI may be harmful.
    • Bellomo, et al analyzed data from the RENAL trial to determine the association between daily fluid balance and outcomes.
    • Investigators found a 70% reduction in 90-day mortality for critically ill patients who had a negative mean daily fluid balance compared to those that had a positive balance.
    • A negative fluid balance was also associated with decreased ICU length of stay and the need for RRT.
  • Take Home Point: Once critically ill patients with AKI are resuscitated, maintaining a slightly negative daily fluid balance may be beneficial.

Show References

Bellomo R, et al. An observational study fluid balance and patient outcomes in the Randomized Evaluation of Normal vs. Augmented Level of Replacement Therapy trial. Crit Care Med 2012; 40:1753-60.



Title: Are femoral-lines really that bad?

Category: Critical Care

Posted: 8/14/2012 by Haney Mallemat, MD

Femoral venous access is typically limited to the acute resuscitation of critically-ill patients. Several practice-guidelines recommend avoiding the femoral site, or removal once admitted to the ICU, because of the risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBI) and deep-vein thrombosis (DVT).

A recent systematic review and meta-analysis (including two randomized-control trials and eight cohort-studies) evaluated the risk of CRBI and DVT for catheters placed in either the internal jugular, subclavian, or femoral-venous sites. No difference in the rate of CRBI or DVT was found between the three sites, although the DVT data was less robust (i.e., contained heterogeneous data).

The authors hypothesized that improvements in sterility during central-line placement (e.g., full-barrier precautions), improved nursing care (e.g., central-line site care), and ultrasound guidance may have led to a reduction in femoral site complications. 

Although a prospective randomized-control trial is necessary to confirm these results, this meta-analysis challenges the traditional teaching that femoral central-access should be avoided.

Show References

Marik, P. et al. The risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection with femoral venous catheters as compared to subclavian and internal jugular venous catheters: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis Crit Care Med. 2012 Aug;40(8):2479-85.

Follow me on Twitter (@criticalcarenow) and Google+ (+haney mallemat)

 



Title: Low-Tidal Volume Ventilation Still Underutilized

Category: Critical Care

Posted: 8/7/2012 by Mike Winters, MBA, MD

Lung Protective Ventilator Settings Still Underutilized

  • It's been over 10 years since the publication of the ARDSnet trial, which demonstrated an 8.8% absolute reduction in short-term mortality for patients with ARDS ventilated with "lung protective" settings (tidal volume 6 ml/kg, plateau pressure < 30 cm H20).
  • A recent study in the BMJ evaluated the association of these settings with 2-yr survival in patients with acute lung injury.
  • The study, carried out in 13 ICUs from 4 academic hospitals in Baltimore, found some surprising results:
    • In patients whose ventilator settings were 100% compliant with lung protective settings, there was an 8% absolute reduction in mortality.
    • For each increase of 1 ml/kg above recommended tidal volume there was an 18% relative increase in mortality.
    • 37% of patients never received lung protective ventilation.
  • Take home point: lung protective settings appear to confer not only short-term but also long-term mortality benefit for patients with acute lung injury, yet remain underutilized even in major academic centers.

Show References

Needham DM, et al. Lung protective mechanical ventilation and two-year survival in patients with acute lung injury: A prospective cohort study. BMJ 2012;344:e2124.



Title: Crystalloids: A Brief History

Category: Critical Care

Posted: 7/31/2012 by Haney Mallemat, MD

Crystalloids (i.e., 0.9% saline and lactated ringers) have been used during resuscitation for more than a century. Their invention, however, was more accidental than intentional.

Crystalloids were first used during the European Cholera epidemic of 1831. Hartog Hamburger later modified this solution in 1896 to the solution we know today as "normal" saline. Hamburger's solution was only intended for in vitro study of RBC lysis and was never intended for clinical use.  

Around this time, Sydney Ringer was testing several fluids to use for physiologic studies. Ringer's lab assistant was erroneously substituting tap water for distilled water when preparing these solutions. Ringer later discovered that this tap water contained minerals making the solution "physiologic", isotonic, and safe for human use; Alexis Hartmann later added sodium lactate to create Ringer's Lactate. 

Since the invention of crystalloids, many types of resuscitation fluids have been created and studied (i.e., albumins, gelatins, and starches); all have been shown to be more expensive, with no more benefit, and with possibly more harm when compared to crystalloids. 

The "perfect" resuscitation fluid still alludes us today, but of all of the solutions marketed crystalloids are arguably the best...despite their accidental history.

Show References

Awad, S. et al. The history of 0.9% saline. Clinical Nutrition 2008 Apr;27(2):179-88. 

Follow me on Twitter (@criticalcarenow) and Google+ (+haney mallemat)



Title: Steroids and Septic Shock

Category: Critical Care

Posted: 7/24/2012 by Mike Winters, MBA, MD (Updated: 7/21/2026)

Steroids and Septic Shock

  • Do low-dose steroids improve mortality or shock reversal in patients with septic shock?
  • A recent systematic review published in the Journal of Emergency Medicine found:
    • A statistically significant improvement in shock reversal (RR 1.17)
    • A favorable, but not statistically significant, mortality benefit for patients with refractory septic shock (RR 0.92; CI 0.79-1.07)
  • Most guidelines recommend against steroids for septic patients that are responding to fluid resuscitation and vasopressor therapy.
  • Updated guidelines from the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (soon to be published) will continue to recommend low-dose IV corticosteroids (200 mg over 24hrs) for those who are refractory to fluids/vasopressors.

Show References

Sherwin RL, Garcia AJ, Bilkovski R. Do low-dose corticosteroids improve mortality or shock reversal in patients with septic shock? A systematic review and position statement prepared for the American Academy of Emergency Medicine. JEM 2012;43:7-12.



Previous  |  1 |  ... |  26 |  27 |  28 |  29 |  30 |  31 |  32 |  33 |  34 |  35 |  36 |  ... |  44 |  Next
University of Maryland School of Medicine logo
  • Departments
  • Programs
  • Research Centers
  • Institutes
  • Graduate Education
  • CIBR Cores
  • Offices of the Dean
    • University of Maryland, Baltimore
    • University of Maryland Medical Center
    • Medical Alumni Association of the University of Maryland
    • Health Sciences and Human Services Library
University of Maryland School of Medicine
655 W. Baltimore Street
Baltimore, MD 21201
Contact Us

© University of Maryland School of Medicine

    • Webmaster
    • Web Accessibility
    • Site Index
    • UMB Hotline
    • Employment
    • Map