University of Maryland School of Medicine logo
Emergency Medicine
All Departments
UMSOM Assistant
UMEM Educational Pearls
  • Home
  • Departments
  • Emergency Medicine
  • CME
  • UMEM Educational Pearls
  • CME
  • Courses and Conferences
  • Free Open Access Medical Education
  • UMEM Educational Pearls

Search

81-100 of 187 results with category "Pharmacology & Therapeutics"

Previous  |  1 |  2 |  3 |  4 |  5 |  6 |  7 |  8 |  9 |  10 |  Next

Title: Clonidine in the acute patient

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: Clonidine, opioid withdrawal (PubMed Search)

Posted: 10/6/2018 by Ashley Martinelli

Clonidine is an alpha-2 agonist commonly used to treat hypertension. Clonidine can also be used to mitigate symptoms of opioid withdrawal as it easily crosses the blood brain barrier and reduces sympathetic effects.

When using clonidine for acute withdrawal or blood pressure control, oral tablets are the preferred route.  Clonidine transdermal patches have slow absorption and take 2-3 days for the effect to be seen.  Once removed, clonidine patches can provide therapeutic levels for up to 20 hours.

Bottom Line: If clonidine is needed acutely for your patient, select oral tablets and titrate to effect.

Show References

Catapres-TTS [package insert] Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Ridgefield, CT, August 2016.



Title: Order of antibiotic administration can affect compliance with CMS sepsis measure

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: Sepsis, Antibiotics, CMS, Core Measures (PubMed Search)

Posted: 9/1/2018 by Wesley Oliver

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) require broad spectrum antibiotics to be administered within 3 hours of presentation of sepsis to be in compliance with the sepsis measure. 

 

Not only do the antibiotics that are chosen determine compliance with this measure, but the order in which antibiotics are given can also significantly affect compliance. 

 

According to CMS, for combination antibiotic therapy, both antibiotics must be started within the three hours following presentation; however, they do not need to be completely infused within this time frame. 

 

Combination therapy typically includes a monotherapy antibiotic (see list in detailed information below) plus vancomycin (daptomycin or linezolid could also be used). 

 

So which antibiotic should be given first? 

 

If a monotherapy antibiotic is given first within the 3 hours of presentation, then compliance for the sepsis measure is met.  These antibiotics cover a broader range of bacteria and are typically infused over ~30 minutes, which allows plenty of time for your second antibiotic to be initiated.  

 

If vancomycin is given first, compliance with this measure can become difficult. First, vancomycin has a narrower spectrum of activity and is not a monotherapy antibiotic. Second, vancomycin infusion rates range from 1 to 2 hours.  Given that antibiotics are usually given after sepsis is flagged, this infusion rate only gives a short period of time for the second antibiotic to be initiated. Thus, vancomycin should almost always be the second antibiotic infused. 

 

In addition, patients may also have limited intravenous access or antibiotics may not be compatible with resuscitation fluids.  All of these factors together must be considered when trying to gain compliance with this measure. 

 

Take-Home Point: 

Administer monotherapy antibiotics (e.g. piperacillin/tazobactam and cefepime) prior to administering vancomycin in your septic patients to improve compliance with the sepsis measure. 

 
 

 

Show Additional Information

Antibiotic Monotherapy Selection
  • Doripenem
  • Ertapenem
  • Imipenem/cilastatin
  • Meropenem
  • Cefotaxime
  • Ceftazidime
  • Ceftriaxone
  • Cefepime
  • Ceftaroline
  • Moxifloxacin
  • Gatifloxacin
  • Amoxicillin/clavulanate
  • Ampicillin/sulbactam
  • Piperacillin/tazobactam
  • Ticarcillin/clavulanate

 

Show References

Specifications Manual for National Hospital Inpatient Quality Measures v5.4. The Joint Commission. https://www.jointcommission.org/specifications_manual_for_national_hospital_inpatient_quality_measures.aspx. Updated December 29, 2017.  Accessed August 31, 2018. 



Title: New-Onset Diabetes with DKA in Adults

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: Diabetes, DKA (PubMed Search)

Posted: 7/7/2018 by Wesley Oliver (Updated: 7/21/2026)

Pearl submitted by James Leonard, PharmD, Clinical Toxicology Fellow
 
A 54-year-old male 1-year post-renal transplant arrives to the emergency department in diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). He has no history of diabetes and is not currently taking steroids for immunosuppression. Home medications include tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and hydrochlorothiazide. Is this latent auto-immune diabetes or something else?
 

Show Additional Information

This presentation is likely tacrolimus-associated post-transplant diabetes.
 
Tacrolimus has been associated with a 43.1% incidence of new-onset diabetes after transplant (NODAT) within 3 years after transplant, with most patients experiencing NODAT within 1-year post-transplant. NODAT can even occur with short-term steroid use (e.g., intraoperative bolus alone). While the mechanism is not 100% clear, it is thought to be due to increased insulin resistance and/or a direct toxic effect on the pancreas.
 
The management of DKA does not change based on the etiology. Long-term management of diabetes in these patients is also similar.

Show References

Woodward RS, Flore MC, Machnicki G, Brennan DC. The long-term outcomes and costs of diabetes mellitus among renal transplant recipients: tacrolimus versus cyclosporine. Value Health. 2011;14(4):443-9.



Title: Steroid Induced Leukocytosis

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: steroids, infection, leukocytosis (PubMed Search)

Posted: 6/2/2018 by Ashley Martinelli (Updated: 7/21/2026)

Steroids induce leukocytosis through the release of cells from bone marrow and the inhibition of neutrophil apoptosis.   This effect typically occurs within the first two weeks of steroid treatment. 

Leukocyte elevation is commonly used in the diagnosis of septic patients; however, this can be hard to discern in patients on concomitant steroid therapy.

A retrospective cohort study of adult patients presenting with fevers and a diagnosis of pneumonia, urinary tract infection, bacteremia, cellulitis, or COPD exacerbation was conducted to determine the maximal level of WBC within the first 24h of admission between patients on acute, chronic, or no steroid treatment.

Results: maximal WBC levels (p< 0.001)

·        Acute steroid therapy: 15.4 ± 8.3 x 10 9/L

·        Chronic steroid therapy: 14.9 ± 7.4 x 10 9/L

·        No steroid therapy: 12.9 ± 6.4 x 10 9/L

An increase in WBC of 5 x 10 9/L can be found in acute and chronic steroid use when presenting with an acute infection and fever.

 

Show References

Frenkel A, Kachko E, Cohen K, Novak V, Maimon N. Estimations of a degree of steroid inducted leukocytosis in patients with acute infections. Am J Emerg Med. 2018;36(5):749-753.

 



Title: Fosfomycin for UTIs

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: Fosfomycin, urinary tract infection, cystitis (PubMed Search)

Posted: 3/3/2018 by Wesley Oliver

Fosfomycin is an antibiotic infrequently used for the treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs). It has a broad spectrum of activity that covers both gram-positive (MRSA, VRE) and gram-negative bacteria (Pseudomonas, ESBL, and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae), which is useful in the treatment of multidrug-resistant bacteria. 

Fosfomycin is FDA approved for the treatment of uncomplicated UTIs in women due to susceptible strains of Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis (3g oral as a single dose). Data has also demonstrated that it can be used for complicated UTIs; however, dosing is different in this population (3 g oral every 2-3 days for 3 doses).  Fosfomycin is not recommended for pyelonephritis.

The broad spectrum of activity, in addition to only needing a single dose in most cases, makes fosfomycin an attractive option; however, it should be reserved for use in certain circumstances.  Fosfomycin should not be considered as a first-line option.  It is also more expensive than other medications (~$100/dose) and in countries with high rates of utilization bacteria are developing resistance to fosfomycin.  In addition, most outpatient pharmacies do not keep this medication in stock.

Take-Home Point:

Fosfomycin should be reserved for multidrug-resistant UTIs in which other first-line options have been exhausted.

Show References

  1. Gupta K, Hooton TM, Naber KG, et al; Infectious Diseases Society of America; European Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. International clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of acute uncomplicated cystitis and pyelonephritis in women: a 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the European Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(5): e103-e120. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciq257.

  2. Michalopoulos AS, Livaditis IG, Gougoutas V. The revival of fosfomycin. Int J Infect Dis. 2011;15(11):e732-e739. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2011.07.007.

  3. MONUROL [prescribing information]. St. Louis, MO: Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc; 2007. www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2008/050717s005lbl.pdf. Accessed 9/7/2017September 7, 2017.

  4. Oteo J, Bautista V, Lara N, et al; Spanish ESBL-EARS-Net Study Group. Parallel increase in community use of fosfomycin and resistance to fosfomycin in extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65(11):2459-2463. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq346.

  5. Raz R. Fosfomycin: an old—new antibiotic. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(1): 4-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03636.x

  6. Reffert JL, Smith WJ. Fosfomycin for the treatment of resistant gram-negative bacterial infections. Insights from the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Pharmacotherapy. 2014;34(8):845-857. doi: 10.1002/phar.1434.

  7. Vardakas KZ, Legakis NJ, Triarides N, Falagas ME. Susceptibility of contemporary isolates to fosfomycin: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2016;47(4):269-285. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.02.001.

  8. Wankum, Michael, et al. “Fosfomycin Use.” Pharmacy Times, 30 Nov. 2017, www.pharmacytimes.com/publications/health-system-edition/2017/november2017/fosfomycin-use.

 



Title: Subcutaneous (SubQ) vs. Intramuscular (IM) Epinephrine in Asthma Exacerbations

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: Epinephrine, Asthma (PubMed Search)

Posted: 1/8/2018 by Wesley Oliver

Patients with severe asthma exacerbations that are unresponsive to inhaled beta-agonists may require the use of epinephrine to control their symptoms.  When patients get to this point what route of administration should be used for the administration of epinephrine?

The most recent asthma guidelines (published in 2007) recommend the use of SubQ epinephrine 0.3-0.5 mg every 20 minutes for 3 doses.  Drug references typically list SubQ or IM epinephrine 0.01 mg/kg (~0.3-0.5 mg) every 20 minutes as appropriate routes of administration.  There is currently no data demonstrating that one route of administration is better than the other in patients with asthma; however, in other disease states, such as anaphylaxis, IM epinephrine is preferred due to the more rapid and reliable absorption over SubQ administration.

Auto-injectors that administer IM epinephrine 0.3 mg are available.  These auto-injectors may decrease the risk of medications error; however, they can be expensive.  SubQ administration requires the use of a syringe and a vial/ampule of 1 mg/mL epinephrine.

Bottom Line: Either SubQ or IM epinephrine administration is appropriate for patients with severe asthma exacerbations.  The preferred method at a given institution will be dictated by historical practice, risk of medication dosing errors, and drug cost.

Show Additional Information

Show References

1. National Asthma Education and Prevention Program, Third Expert Panel on the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. Expert Panel Report 3: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. Bethesda (MD): National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (US); 2007 Aug. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK7232/

2.Simons FER, Ardusso LRF, Bilo MB, El-Gamal YM, Ledford DK, Ring J, et al. World Allergy Organization Anaphylaxis Guidelines: Summary. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;127(3):587–93. e1-e20.



Title: Insulin for Hyperkalemia

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: Insulin, Hyperkalemia, Dextrose (PubMed Search)

Posted: 11/6/2017 by Wesley Oliver (Updated: 7/21/2026)

Strategies for Hyperkalemia Management

Stabilize cardiac membrane

Calcium gluconate

Intracellular movement in skeletal muscles

Albuterol

Sodium Bicarbonate

Insulin

Potassium excretion

Loop Diuretics

Kayexalate

Patiromer (chronic use only)

Potassium removal

Dialysis

 

Insulin mechanism of action for hyperkalemia:

· Binds to skeletal muscle receptors

· Increased activity of the sodium-potassium adenosine triphosphatase and glucose transporter GLUT4

· Glycemic response occurs at lower levels of insulin

· Potassium transport activity increases as insulin levels increase

Patients with insulin resistance due to type-2 diabetes do not become resistant to the kalemic effects of insulin.

 

Hypoglycemia following insulin administration for hyperkalemia:

· Occurs 1-3 hours post dose, even with initial bolus of dextrose

· The amount of glucose is insufficient to replace the glucose utilized in response to the administered dose of insulin

· Insulin’s half-life is increased in ESRD leading to longer duration of action

 

A systematic review of 11 studies regarding insulin dosing for hyperkalemia:

· 22 patients (18%) experienced hypoglycemia

· Studies that only gave 25 grams (1 amp) of dextrose had the highest incidence of hypoglycemia (30%)

 

Tips:

· Consider insulin dose reduction in patients with renal failure

· Use an order set to ensure patients receive appropriate POC glucose monitoring to detect delayed onset of hypoglycemia

· Dextrose 50% (25 grams) should be given to all patients with pre-insulin BG <350 mg/dL

Subsequent PRN dextrose 50% (25 grams) should be used to maintain BG >100 mg/dL after insulin administration

Show References

References:

1. Sterns RH, Grieff M, Bernstein PL. Treatment of hyperkalemia: something old, something new. Kidney International 2016;89(3):5460554.

2. Harel Z, Kamel KS (2016) Optimal Dose and Method of Administration of Intravenous Insulin in the Management of Emergency Hyperkalemia: A Systematic Review. PLoS ONE 11(5): e0154963. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0154963



Title: Fever Treatment in Sepsis

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: antipyretic, sepsis, fever (PubMed Search)

Posted: 10/10/2017 by Ashley Martinelli (Updated: 7/21/2026)

Fever occurs in 40% of patients with sepsis.  Historically, there has been conflicting evidence of whether patient outcomes improve with antipyretic therapy.

A recent large meta-analysis assessed the effect of antipyretic therapy on mortality of critically ill septic patients.  The analysis included 8 randomized studies (1,531 patients) and 8 observational studies (17,432 patients) that assessed mortality of septic patients with and without antipyretic therapy.

The authors found no difference in mortality at 28 days or during hospital admission.  There was also no difference in shock reversal, heart rate, or minute ventilation.

As expected, they found a statistically significant reduction in posttreatment body temperature (-0.38°C, 95% IC -0.63 to -0.13) in patients who received antipyretic therapy.  NSAIDs and cooling therapies were more effective than acetaminophen, however no agent or dosing information was provided and only one study included physical cooling therapies.

Bottom Line: Antipyretic therapies do not reduce mortality in patients with sepsis, but they may improve patient comfort by reducing body temperature.

 

Show References

Drewry AM, et al. Antipyretic therapy in critically ill septic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 2017;45:806-813.



Title: Alpha-Blockers for the Management of Ureteral Stones

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: Ureteral stones, Alpha-blockers (PubMed Search)

Posted: 9/2/2017 by Wesley Oliver (Updated: 7/21/2026)

Alpha-blockers (tamsulosin, alfuzosin, doxazosin, and terazosin) are antagonists of alpha1A-adrenoreceptors, which results in the relaxation of ureteral smooth muscle.    Current evidence suggests alpha-blockers may be useful when ureteral stones are 5-10 mm; however, there is no evidence to support the use of alpha-blockers with stones <5 mm.  Patients with ureteral stones >10 mm were excluded from studies utilizing these medications.

The size of most ureteral stones will be unknown due to the lack of need for imaging able to measure stone size. Given that the median ureteral stone size is <5 mm, most patients will not benefit from the use of an alpha-blocker.

Also, keep in mind that the data for adverse events with alpha-blockers used for ureteral stones is limited and that these medications have a risk of hypotension.

 

Show Additional Information

Ferre RM et al. Tamsulosin for ureteral stones in the emergency department: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med 2009.

  • 77 patients

  • Ibuprofen + oxycodone + tamsulosin vs. ibuprofen + oxycodone

  • Stone expulsion at 14 days: Tamsulosin group=77.1% vs. Standard therapy=64.9%

-Difference=12% (95% CI: -8.4-32.8%)

  • No clinically/statistically significant differences

 

Pickard R et al. Medical expulsive therapy in adults with ureteric colic: a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2015.

  • 1,136 patients

  • Tamsulosin vs. nifedipine vs. placebo

  • No further intervention at 4 weeks: Tamsulosin=81% vs. Nifedipine=80% vs. Placebo=80%

  • No clinically/statistically significant differences

 

Furyk JS et al. Distal ureteric stones and tamsulosin: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter trial. Ann Emerg Med 2016.

  • 403 patients

  • Tamsulosin vs. placebo

  • Stone passage at 28 days: Tamsulosin=87% vs. Placebo=81.9%

-Difference=5% (95% CI: -3-13%)

  • Found difference in subgroup analysis of large stones (5-10 mm)

-Tamsulosin=83.3% vs. Placebo=61%

-Difference=22.4% (95% CI: 3.1-41.6%)

  • No other clinically/statistically significant differences

 

Hollingsworth JM et al. Alpha blockers for treatment of ureteric stones: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2016.

  • Meta-analysis of 55 trials

  • No benefit in patients with smaller stones (<5 mm): RR=1.19 (95% CI: 1.00-1.98)

  • Benefit in patients with larger stones (5-10 mm): RR=1.57 (95% CI: 1.39-1.61)

Show References

1.) Ferre RM, Wasielewski JN, Strout TD, Perron AD. Tamsulosin for ureteral stones in the emergency department: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med 2009;54:432-9.

2.) Furyk JS, Chu K, Banks C, et al. Distal ureteric stones and tamsulosin: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter trial. Ann Emerg Med 2016;67:86-95.

3.) Hollingsworth JM, Canales BK, Rogers MAM, et al. Alpha blockers for treatment of ureteric stones: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2016;355:i6112.

4.) Pickard R, Starr K, MacLennan G, et al. Medical expulsive therapy in adults with ureteric colic: a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2015;386:341-9.

 


Title: Levofloxacin dosing for CAP

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: Levofloxacin, duration, dose, CAP, pneumonia (PubMed Search)

Posted: 7/1/2017 by Jill Logan (Updated: 7/21/2026)

When you look up dosing for levofloxacin for community acquired pneumonia (CAP), you will find that both of the following options are approved:

  • Levofloxacin 500 mg IV/PO daily x 7-14 days
  • Levofloxacin 750 mg IV/PO daily x 5 days

This is based on a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active treatment trial comparing these two regimens in CAP (mild to severe). This non-inferiority trial shows that the 750 mg dose of levofloxacin for 5 days is "at least as effective and well tolerated" as the 500 mg dose of levofloxacin for 10 days.

So why should you choose the 750 mg daily x 5 day regimen?

  • Higher doses maximize the concentration-dependent pharmacokinetic profile of the drug
  • Higher doses and shorter duration may be associated with less drug resistance
  • Patients subjectively report feeling better at day 3 with the higher dose regimen

As alway with levofloxacin, don't forget to renally dose adjust subsequent doses when writting a script or scheduled inpatient order for patients with reduced creatinine clearance! 

Show Additional Information

Show References

Dunbar LM, Wunderink RG, Habib MP, et al. High-dose, short-course levofloxacin for community-acquired pneumonia: A new treatment paradigm. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;37:752-60.



Title: S.aureus in the urine and the risk for bacteremia

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: MSSA, MRSA, bacturia, bacteremia, Staph aureus, Staphlococcus aureus (PubMed Search)

Posted: 6/4/2017 by Jill Logan (Updated: 7/21/2026)

  • The incidence of Staphylococcus aurea as a urinary pathogen is increasing, however, this finding may represent more than a simple urinary tract infection.
  • One review found an 8-21%rate of association between S. aureus in the urine with bacteremia.
  • Additional work up, including blood cultures, may be warranted in patients with systemic symptoms, lack of access to follow up, and no urinary tract pathology or instrumentation.

Show Additional Information

Risk factors associated with S. aureus bacturia include:

  • catheterization and/or invasive urologic procedures
  • Urinary obstruction
  • Malignancy
  • Long term care facility residence
  • Recent antibiotics

Show References

Al Mohajer M, Darouiche RO. Staphylococcus aureus bacteriura: source, clinical relevance, and management. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2012;14:601-6.



Title: Trouble treating your gastroparetic? Consider an antipsychotic! (Submitted by Dr. Bradford Schwartz)

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Posted: 4/27/2017 by Tu Carol Nguyen, DO

Haloperidol has a higher D2 receptor antagonist effect than standard antiemetic treatment agents such as metoclopramide. In addition, newer antipsychotic agents such as Olanzapine have a high affinity at multiple antiemetic sites such as the dopamine and serotinergic receptors.

While formal RCT's are still in the works, multiple sources including palliative care, emergency medicine, and pain journals support their use in refractory emesis.


Consider Haloperidol 3-5 mg IV. 
Check an EKG for long QTc prior to use. Consider dose reduction of haloperidol in those with hepatic impairment. Also consider dose reduction in patients taking carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, rifampicin, or quinidine due to that pesky CYP3A4 inhibition. 

Consider Olanzapine 2-5 mg IV.

Several case reports have shown a higher rate of success with olanzapine for refractory emesis. Olanzapine has similar precautions as those to haloperidol (EKG, hepatic impairment), although it's CYP drug interactions are less common. Additionally, use olanzapine cautiously in hyperglycemic patients as there are several case reports of olanzapine prompting episodes of DKA. Consider frequent blood sugar checks or small doses of insulin in hyperglycemic patients. 

 

Take Home Points:

Consider the antipsychotic agents Haloperidol or Olanzapine for patients with refractory emesis, they may be more effective than traditional antiemetics. 

Get an EKG prior to administration to check for QTc prolongation. As the classical and atypical antipsychotic agents are sedating, use caution in conjunction with other sedating medications (such as benzodiazepines).  

 

Show Additional Information

Show References

Glare P, Miller J, Nikolova T, Tickoo R. Treating nausea and vomiting in palliative care: a review. Clin Interv Aging. 2011;6:243-59.

Prommer E. Olanzapine: palliative medicine update. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2013 Feb;30(1):75-82

Pommer E. Role of Haloperidol in Palliative Medicine: An Update. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2012 Jun;29(4):295-301


Navari RM, Nagy CK, Gray SE. The use of olanzapine versus metoclopramide for the treatment of breakthrough nausea and vomiting in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer. 2013 Jun;21(6):1655-63.

Jackson WC, Tavernier L (2003) Olanzapine for intractable nausea in palliative care patients. J Palliat Med 6:251–255 
Hasse Abrahamsson. Treatment options for patients with severe gastroparesis. Gut. 2007 Jun; 56(6): 877–883.
 
Bradford MV, Glode A. Olanzapine: An antiemetic option for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. J Adv Pract Onc. 2014 Jan;5(1):24-9.
 
Chan EW, Knott, JC, Taylor DM, Phillips GA, Kong DC. Intravenous olanzapine- another option for the acutely agitated patient. Emery Med Australas. 2009 Jun; 21 (3) 241-2
 
Cole JB et al. A prospective observational study of patients receiving intravenous and intramuscular olanzapine in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 2016 Nov 4; [e-pub]. 
 
C. Roldan, Y. Chathampally. Haloperidol vs. placebo in addition to conventional therapy to treat pain secondary to gastroparesis in the emergency department. Journal Of Pain. April 2015 Volume 16, Issue 4, Supplement, Page S34

P. Stalcup, B. Croft, R. Ramirez, M. Darracq. Research Forum Abstract: 204 Haloperidol Undermining Gastroparesis Symptoms in the Emergency Department. Annals Of Emergency Medicine. October 2016. Volume 68, Issue 4, Supplement, Page S80


Ramirez R et al. Haloperidol Undermining Gastroparesis Symptoms (HUGS) in the Emergency Department. AJEM 2017


Lindenmayer JP, Patel R. Olazapine-induced ketoacidosis with diabetes mellitus (letter) Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156:1471

Roefaro J, Mukherjee SM. Olanzapine-lnduced hyperglycemic nonketonic coma. Ann Pharmacother. 2001;35:300–2.

 Lee JS, Kim JY, Ahn JH, Kim CY. Diabetic ketoacidosis in a schizophrenic patient treated with olanzapine: a case report. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 2005;44:116–119.

Ragucci KR, Wells BJ. Olanzapine-induced diabetic ketoacidosis. Ann Pharmocother. 2001; 35: (12) 1556-8


Title: On your radar: methadone-linezolid drug-drug interaction

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: methadone, linezolid, serotonin syndrome, drug interaction (PubMed Search)

Posted: 4/1/2017 by Michelle Hines, PharmD (Updated: 4/3/2017)

Linezolid is a weak, nonselective monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI). A recent FDA Drug Safety Communication released in March 2016 noted reports of serotonin syndrome associated with certain opioids, particularly fentanyl and methadone. Development of serotonin syndrome after concomitant administration of linezolid with other serotonergic agents has been reported. Due to a potential risk of serotonin syndrome, a patient on chronic methadone should not be started on concomitant linezolid unless they will be monitored.

Show References

  1. FDA Drug Safety Communication from 3/22/2016: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DrugSafety/UCM491302.pdf
  2. Product Information: DOLOPHINE(R) oral tablets, methadone HCl oral tablets. West-Ward Pharmaceuticals Corp. (per FDA), Eatontown, NJ, 2016.
  3. Product Information: ZYVOX(R) intravenous injection, oral tablets, oral suspension, linezolid intravenous injection, oral tablets, oral suspension. Pharmacia & Upjohn Co (per FDA), New York, NY, 2013.

Follow me on Twitter @mEDPharmD



Title: Naproxen plus adjunct diazepam or placebo for low back pain

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: NSAID, diazepam, back pain (PubMed Search)

Posted: 3/4/2017 by Michelle Hines, PharmD (Updated: 7/21/2026)

The addition of diazepam to naproxen for patients with acute, nontraumatic, nonradicular lower back pain did not improve pain or functional outcomes at 1 week or 3 months after ED discharge compared to placebo.

Show Additional Information

Study design: single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Patients:

  • Adults age 21 to 69 years who preseted to the ED for management of nontraumatic, nonradicular low back pain <2 weeks in duration with score >5 on Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) who were discharged home from the ED
  • Exclusion criteria: radicular back pain, nonmusculoskeletal etiology of pain, direct back trauma within past 1 month, pregnant/breast feeding, chronic pain syndrome

Treatment groups:

  • Control: naproxen 500 mg PO twice daily + placebo 1-2 tablets PO every 12 hours PRN pain
  • Intervention: naproxen 500 mg PO twice daily + diazepam 5 to 10 mg PO every 12 hours PRN pain

Outcomes:

  • Primary: RMDQ score 1 week after ED discharge
  • Secondary: pain intensity 1 week and 3 months after ED discharge

Results:

  • Of 545 patients assessed for enrollment, data from 57 in the diazepam group and 55 in the placebo group were included in the primary outcome analysis
  • No difference in mean improvement in RMDQ score between the naproxen + placebo (11; 95% CI 8 to 13) and naproxen + diazepam (11; 95% CI 9 to 13) groups at 1 week
  • No difference in incidence of moderate or severe low back pain between the naproxen + placebo (22%; 95% CI 13% to 35%) or naproxen + diazepam (32%; 95% CI 21% to 45%) groups at 1 week or 3 months (naproxen + placebo, 9%; 95% CI 4% to 21%) (naproxen + diazepam, 12%; 95% CI 5% to 24%)
  • No difference in the incidence of adverse effects between groups

Conclusions:

  • The addition of diazepam to naproxen for patients with acute, nontraumatic, nonradicular lower back pain did not improve pain or functional outcomes at 1 week or 3 months after ED discharge compared to placebo.
  • This study does not support adding diazepam to an NSAID to outpatient therapy for acute, nontraumatic, nonradicular low back pain.

Show References

Citation: Friedman BW, Irizarry E, Solorzano C, et al. Diazepam is no better than placebo when added to naproxen for acute low back pain. Ann Emerg Med 2017. PMID 28187918

Follow me on Twitter @mEDPharmD



Title: Pharmacy Pearls from the 2016 Surviving Sepsis Guidelines

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: sepsis, antibiotics, vasopressors, shock (PubMed Search)

Posted: 2/4/2017 by Michelle Hines, PharmD (Updated: 7/21/2026)

Below is a list of pharmacy-related pearls from the 2016 Surviving Sepsis Guidelines:

  • Fluid resuscitation: 30 mg/kg IV crystalloids within 3 hours (strong recommendation, low quality evidence)
  • Vasopressors:
    • MAP target 65 mm Hg (strong recommendation, low quality evidence)
    • Norepinephrine 1st line (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). Epinephrine (weak recommendation, low quality evidence) or up to 0.03 Units/min vasopressin (weak recommendation, moderate quality evidence) may be added to NE.
  • Antibiotics:
    • Obtain blood cultures prior to administration, but do not delay antibiotics (best practice)
    • Initiate empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics within 1 hour (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence)
    • Consider double gram-negative coverage in patients with septic shock at high risk of multidrug-resistant pathogen
    • Risk factors for invasive Candida infection: immunocompromised state, TPN, necrotizing pancreatitis, recent major abdominal surgery, recent fungal infection
    • Optimize pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties- e.g., IV loading dose of vancomycin of 25-30 mg/kg is favored (best practice)
  • Corticosteroids: IV hydrocortisone 200 mg per day if hemodynamic stability is not achieved through crystalloids and vasopressors (weak recommendation, low quality evidence)

Show References

Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: International guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Crit Care Med 2017; 3. [PMID 28098591]

Follow me on Twitter @mEDPharmD



Title: Ketorolac's analgesic ceiling

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: ketorolac, NSAID, analgesia (PubMed Search)

Posted: 1/7/2017 by Michelle Hines, PharmD (Updated: 7/21/2026)

In a study comparing ketorolac IV doses of 10 mg, 15 mg, and 30 mg, no difference in pain score reduction or need for rescue analgesia was observed.

Show Additional Information

  • Randomized, double-blind trial comparing the efficacy of ketorolac 10 mg, 15 mg, and 30 mg IV in adults aged 18 to 65 years presenting to the ED for acute abdominal, flank, headache, or musculoskeletal pain rated 5 or greater on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale
  • The primary outcome was reduction in numeric rating scale pain score at 30 minutes. Pain scores, vital signs, and adverse effects were recorded at baseline and at 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes post-ketorolac administration.
  • Morphine 0.1 mg/kg IV was used as rescue analgesia at 30 minutes if needed.
  • A majority of patients included complained of abdominal, flank, or musculoskeletal pain.
  • At 30 minutes post-administration, there were no differences in reduction of mean pain scores from baseline between the 10 mg (baseline score 7.7, 30-minute score 5.2), 15 mg (baseline score 7.5, 30-minute score 5.1), or 30 mg (baseline score 7.8, 30-minute score 4.8) groups.

Based upon this study, lower ketorolac doses of 10 mg or 15 mg are equal in analgesic efficacy to a higher dose of 30 mg. A lower dose of 10 mg or 15 mg should be used to avoid adverse effects.

Show References

Motov S, Yasavolian M, Likourezos A, et al. Comparison of intravenous ketorolac at three single-dose regimens for treating acute pain in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med 2016. PMID 27993418

Follow me on Twitter @mEDPharmD



Title: Esmolol in refractory ventricular fibrillation

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: esmolol, ventricular fibrillation, cardiac arrest (PubMed Search)

Posted: 12/3/2016 by Michelle Hines, PharmD (Updated: 12/3/2016)

Consider esmolol IV 500 mcg/kg loading dose followed by a continuous infusion of 0-100 mcg/kg/min for patients in refractory ventricular fibrillation 

Show Additional Information

  • Two small, retrospective studies have described increased rates of sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in patients with refractory ventricular fibrillation who received esmolol IV 500 mcg/kg loading dose followed by 0-100 mcg/kg/min continuous infusion.
  • In both studies, refractory ventricular fibrillation was defined as ventricular fibrillation that was resistant to ≥3 defibrillations, 3 mg epinephrine, and 300 mg amiodarone.
  • The study by Driver, et al reports that 4 of 6 (67%) patients who received esmolol, compared to 6 of 19 who did not receive esmolol, achieved sustained ROSC.
  • In the study by Lee, et al, sustained ROSC was significantly more common in patients who received esmolol (9/15 (56%)) than those who did not receive esmolol (4/25 (16%)) (p=0.007).

Show References

  1. Driver BE, Debaty G, Plummer DW, et al. Use of esmolol after failure of standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation to treat patients with refractory ventricular fibrillation. Resuscitation 2014; 85:1337-41. [PMID 25033747]
  2. Lee YH, Lee KJ, Min YH, et al. Refractory ventricular fibrillation treated with esmolol. Resuscitation 2016; 107:150-5. [PMID 27523955]

Follow me on Twitter @mEDPharmD



Title: Subcutaneous UFH as Anticoagulation Bridge

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: anticoagulation, warfarin, heparin, bridge, DVT (PubMed Search)

Posted: 11/5/2016 by Michelle Hines, PharmD

Do you have a patient with renal insufficiency who is in need of an anticoagulation bridge to warfarin? Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin (UFH) as an initial dose of 333 Units/kg subcutaneously followed by a fixed dose of 250 Units/kg (actual body weight) every 12 hours may be an alternative to admission for heparin infusion with monitoring.

Show Additional Information

Practical Considerations:

  • UFH 20,000 Units/1 ml vial size is available – call the pharmacy to ensure it is in stock.
  • The patient will need a prescription for syringes.
  • To minimize the potential for dosing errors, it may be safest to avoid using subcutaneous UFH for outpatients >80 kg, so that only 1 vial will be used per dose (250 Units/kg x 80 kg = 20,000 Units).
  • The mean weight in a study assessing the safety and efficacy of this regimen was 82 +/- 19 kg. The mean weight in a study pharmacokinetic study comparing the peak antithrombin effect between subcutaneous UFH and low molecular weight heparins was 108 +/- 27.2 kg. 

Show References

  1. Kearon C, Ginsberg JS, Julian JA, et al. Comparison of fixed-dose weight-adjusted unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin for acute treatment of venous thromboembolism. JAMA 2006; 296:935-42. [PMID 16926353]

  2. Morris TA, Jacobson A, Marsh JJ, et al. Pharmacokinetics of UH and LMWH are similar with respect to antithrombin activity. Thromb Res 2005; 115:45-51. [PMID 15567452]

  3. Holbrook A, Schulman S, Witt DM, et al. Evidence-based management of anticoagulant therapy: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. CHEST 2012; 141(2)(Suppl):e152S-e184S. [PMID 22315259]

Follow me on Twitter @mEDPharmD



Title: Effect of QTc-prolonging agents in emergent dialysis patients with baseline QTc prolongation

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: QTc prolongation, torsades, antiemetics, antihistamines (PubMed Search)

Posted: 10/1/2016 by Michelle Hines, PharmD

What they did:

  • End stage renal disease (ESRD) patients presenting to the ED for emergent hemodialysis (HD) with baseline QTc prolongation (>450 msec in men and >470 msec in women) were given antiemetics or antihistamines for symptomatic relief of nausea and pruritis. A repeat ECG was obtained 2 hours after medications were given.
  • Most patients received oral or intravenous promethazine 25 mg, ondansetron 4-8 mg, or diphenhydramine 25-50 mg.

What they found:

  • 44 patients had a mean initial QTc of 483.7 msec (SD 18.4). Two hours after medication administration, the mean QTc was 483.8 msec (SD 20.0).
  • Among 13 patients with initial QTc intervals >500 msec, 9 had an increased QTc interval after medication administration (average increase 11.8 msec, SD 6.7 msec).
  • 8 patients with baseline QTc <500 msec had QTc >500 msec after medication administration.
  • No patients experienced dysrhythmias, death, or were admitted for dysrhythmia or syncope 1 week after medication administration.

Application to clinical practice:

  • While the mean QTc did not change, the proportion of individuals who experienced an increase in QTc interval is not reported.
  • Although greatly limited by a small sample size, this study suggests that usual doses of promethazine, ondansetron, or diphenhydramine in patients presenting for emergent HD with baseline QTc prolongation may be safe.
  • Additional studies, especially in patients with QTc prolongation >500 msec, are warranted.

Show References

Burdette S, Roppolo LP, Green W, et al. The effect of antiemetics and antihistamines on the QTc interval in emergent dialysis patients with baseline QTc prolongation. J Emerg Med 2016; 51:99-105. (PMID 27614302)

Follow me on Twitter @mEDPharmD



Title: The INCH Trial: FFP versus PCC

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: FFP,PCC,ICH,warfarin (PubMed Search)

Posted: 9/3/2016 by Michelle Hines, PharmD

Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) are used for INR reversal in patients on vitamin K antagonists (VKA) (e.g., warfarin) with life-threatening bleeding. Guidelines from the Neurocritical Care Society and Society of Critical Care Medicine recommend using PCC over FFP for patients with VKA-associated hemorrhage and an INR >=1.4.

New study-INCH trial:

  • Multi-center, prospective, randomized, open-label trial comparing FFP IV 20 ml/kg + phytonadione IV 10 mg versus 4-factor PCC IV 30 IU/kg + phytonadione IV 10 mg
  • Adult patients on VKA with intracerebral or subdural hemorrhage with INR >=2.0 were included. Patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage were excluded.

What they found:

  • Analysis included 50 (23 FFP and 27 PCC) patients (trial was stopped early after a safety analysis)
  • 2 (9%) patients in the FFP group and 18 (67%) patients in the PCC group achieved an INR <=1.2 within 3 hours (adjusted OR 30.6, 95% CI 4.7-197.9; p=0.0003)
  • Hematoma expansion at 3 hours was higher in those treated with FFP than PCC (adjusted difference 16.9 ml, 95% CI 2.5-31.3; p=0.023)
  • Time until INR <=1.2 was longer in the FFP group than the PCC group (1482 vs 40 minutes; p=0.050)

Application to clinical practice:

  • Of note, FFP 30 ml/kg has been suggested to provide more complete coagulation factor correction (this trial used 20 ml/kg), and package inserts for PCCs recommend doses based on INR and weight (this trial used 30 IU/kg for all patients)
  • Although the sample size was small, this study suggests that in patients with VKA-associated non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage and an elevated INR, PCC may provide faster INR correction than FFP, and may additionally be associated with a smaller degree of hematoma expansion.

Show References

  1. Frontera JA, Lewin JJ, Rabinstein AA, et al. Guideline for reversal of antithrombotics in intracranial hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care 2016; 24:6-46. (PMID 26714677)

  2. Steiner T, Poli S, Griebe M, et al. Fresh frozen plasma versus prothrombin complex concentrate in patients with intracranial haemorrhage related to vitamin K antagonists (INCH): a randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 2016; 15:566-73. (PMID 27302126)

Follow me on Twitter @mEDPharmD



Previous  |  1 |  2 |  3 |  4 |  5 |  6 |  7 |  8 |  9 |  10 |  Next
University of Maryland School of Medicine logo
  • Departments
  • Programs
  • Research Centers
  • Institutes
  • Graduate Education
  • CIBR Cores
  • Offices of the Dean
    • University of Maryland, Baltimore
    • University of Maryland Medical Center
    • Medical Alumni Association of the University of Maryland
    • Health Sciences and Human Services Library
University of Maryland School of Medicine
655 W. Baltimore Street
Baltimore, MD 21201
Contact Us

© University of Maryland School of Medicine

    • Webmaster
    • Web Accessibility
    • Site Index
    • UMB Hotline
    • Employment
    • Map