University of Maryland School of Medicine logo
Emergency Medicine
All Departments
UMSOM Assistant
UMEM Educational Pearls
  • Home
  • Departments
  • Emergency Medicine
  • CME
  • UMEM Educational Pearls
  • CME
  • Courses and Conferences
  • Free Open Access Medical Education
  • UMEM Educational Pearls

Search

1-10 of 10 results by Michelle Hines


Title: On your radar: methadone-linezolid drug-drug interaction

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: methadone, linezolid, serotonin syndrome, drug interaction (PubMed Search)

Posted: 4/1/2017 by Michelle Hines, PharmD (Updated: 4/3/2017)

Linezolid is a weak, nonselective monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI). A recent FDA Drug Safety Communication released in March 2016 noted reports of serotonin syndrome associated with certain opioids, particularly fentanyl and methadone. Development of serotonin syndrome after concomitant administration of linezolid with other serotonergic agents has been reported. Due to a potential risk of serotonin syndrome, a patient on chronic methadone should not be started on concomitant linezolid unless they will be monitored.

Show References

  1. FDA Drug Safety Communication from 3/22/2016: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DrugSafety/UCM491302.pdf
  2. Product Information: DOLOPHINE(R) oral tablets, methadone HCl oral tablets. West-Ward Pharmaceuticals Corp. (per FDA), Eatontown, NJ, 2016.
  3. Product Information: ZYVOX(R) intravenous injection, oral tablets, oral suspension, linezolid intravenous injection, oral tablets, oral suspension. Pharmacia & Upjohn Co (per FDA), New York, NY, 2013.

Follow me on Twitter @mEDPharmD



Title: Naproxen plus adjunct diazepam or placebo for low back pain

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: NSAID, diazepam, back pain (PubMed Search)

Posted: 3/4/2017 by Michelle Hines, PharmD (Updated: 7/21/2026)

The addition of diazepam to naproxen for patients with acute, nontraumatic, nonradicular lower back pain did not improve pain or functional outcomes at 1 week or 3 months after ED discharge compared to placebo.

Show Additional Information

Study design: single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Patients:

  • Adults age 21 to 69 years who preseted to the ED for management of nontraumatic, nonradicular low back pain <2 weeks in duration with score >5 on Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) who were discharged home from the ED
  • Exclusion criteria: radicular back pain, nonmusculoskeletal etiology of pain, direct back trauma within past 1 month, pregnant/breast feeding, chronic pain syndrome

Treatment groups:

  • Control: naproxen 500 mg PO twice daily + placebo 1-2 tablets PO every 12 hours PRN pain
  • Intervention: naproxen 500 mg PO twice daily + diazepam 5 to 10 mg PO every 12 hours PRN pain

Outcomes:

  • Primary: RMDQ score 1 week after ED discharge
  • Secondary: pain intensity 1 week and 3 months after ED discharge

Results:

  • Of 545 patients assessed for enrollment, data from 57 in the diazepam group and 55 in the placebo group were included in the primary outcome analysis
  • No difference in mean improvement in RMDQ score between the naproxen + placebo (11; 95% CI 8 to 13) and naproxen + diazepam (11; 95% CI 9 to 13) groups at 1 week
  • No difference in incidence of moderate or severe low back pain between the naproxen + placebo (22%; 95% CI 13% to 35%) or naproxen + diazepam (32%; 95% CI 21% to 45%) groups at 1 week or 3 months (naproxen + placebo, 9%; 95% CI 4% to 21%) (naproxen + diazepam, 12%; 95% CI 5% to 24%)
  • No difference in the incidence of adverse effects between groups

Conclusions:

  • The addition of diazepam to naproxen for patients with acute, nontraumatic, nonradicular lower back pain did not improve pain or functional outcomes at 1 week or 3 months after ED discharge compared to placebo.
  • This study does not support adding diazepam to an NSAID to outpatient therapy for acute, nontraumatic, nonradicular low back pain.

Show References

Citation: Friedman BW, Irizarry E, Solorzano C, et al. Diazepam is no better than placebo when added to naproxen for acute low back pain. Ann Emerg Med 2017. PMID 28187918

Follow me on Twitter @mEDPharmD



Title: Pharmacy Pearls from the 2016 Surviving Sepsis Guidelines

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: sepsis, antibiotics, vasopressors, shock (PubMed Search)

Posted: 2/4/2017 by Michelle Hines, PharmD (Updated: 7/21/2026)

Below is a list of pharmacy-related pearls from the 2016 Surviving Sepsis Guidelines:

  • Fluid resuscitation: 30 mg/kg IV crystalloids within 3 hours (strong recommendation, low quality evidence)
  • Vasopressors:
    • MAP target 65 mm Hg (strong recommendation, low quality evidence)
    • Norepinephrine 1st line (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence). Epinephrine (weak recommendation, low quality evidence) or up to 0.03 Units/min vasopressin (weak recommendation, moderate quality evidence) may be added to NE.
  • Antibiotics:
    • Obtain blood cultures prior to administration, but do not delay antibiotics (best practice)
    • Initiate empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics within 1 hour (strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence)
    • Consider double gram-negative coverage in patients with septic shock at high risk of multidrug-resistant pathogen
    • Risk factors for invasive Candida infection: immunocompromised state, TPN, necrotizing pancreatitis, recent major abdominal surgery, recent fungal infection
    • Optimize pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties- e.g., IV loading dose of vancomycin of 25-30 mg/kg is favored (best practice)
  • Corticosteroids: IV hydrocortisone 200 mg per day if hemodynamic stability is not achieved through crystalloids and vasopressors (weak recommendation, low quality evidence)

Show References

Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: International guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Crit Care Med 2017; 3. [PMID 28098591]

Follow me on Twitter @mEDPharmD



Title: Ketorolac's analgesic ceiling

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: ketorolac, NSAID, analgesia (PubMed Search)

Posted: 1/7/2017 by Michelle Hines, PharmD (Updated: 7/21/2026)

In a study comparing ketorolac IV doses of 10 mg, 15 mg, and 30 mg, no difference in pain score reduction or need for rescue analgesia was observed.

Show Additional Information

  • Randomized, double-blind trial comparing the efficacy of ketorolac 10 mg, 15 mg, and 30 mg IV in adults aged 18 to 65 years presenting to the ED for acute abdominal, flank, headache, or musculoskeletal pain rated 5 or greater on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale
  • The primary outcome was reduction in numeric rating scale pain score at 30 minutes. Pain scores, vital signs, and adverse effects were recorded at baseline and at 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes post-ketorolac administration.
  • Morphine 0.1 mg/kg IV was used as rescue analgesia at 30 minutes if needed.
  • A majority of patients included complained of abdominal, flank, or musculoskeletal pain.
  • At 30 minutes post-administration, there were no differences in reduction of mean pain scores from baseline between the 10 mg (baseline score 7.7, 30-minute score 5.2), 15 mg (baseline score 7.5, 30-minute score 5.1), or 30 mg (baseline score 7.8, 30-minute score 4.8) groups.

Based upon this study, lower ketorolac doses of 10 mg or 15 mg are equal in analgesic efficacy to a higher dose of 30 mg. A lower dose of 10 mg or 15 mg should be used to avoid adverse effects.

Show References

Motov S, Yasavolian M, Likourezos A, et al. Comparison of intravenous ketorolac at three single-dose regimens for treating acute pain in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med 2016. PMID 27993418

Follow me on Twitter @mEDPharmD



Title: Esmolol in refractory ventricular fibrillation

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: esmolol, ventricular fibrillation, cardiac arrest (PubMed Search)

Posted: 12/3/2016 by Michelle Hines, PharmD (Updated: 12/3/2016)

Consider esmolol IV 500 mcg/kg loading dose followed by a continuous infusion of 0-100 mcg/kg/min for patients in refractory ventricular fibrillation 

Show Additional Information

  • Two small, retrospective studies have described increased rates of sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in patients with refractory ventricular fibrillation who received esmolol IV 500 mcg/kg loading dose followed by 0-100 mcg/kg/min continuous infusion.
  • In both studies, refractory ventricular fibrillation was defined as ventricular fibrillation that was resistant to ≥3 defibrillations, 3 mg epinephrine, and 300 mg amiodarone.
  • The study by Driver, et al reports that 4 of 6 (67%) patients who received esmolol, compared to 6 of 19 who did not receive esmolol, achieved sustained ROSC.
  • In the study by Lee, et al, sustained ROSC was significantly more common in patients who received esmolol (9/15 (56%)) than those who did not receive esmolol (4/25 (16%)) (p=0.007).

Show References

  1. Driver BE, Debaty G, Plummer DW, et al. Use of esmolol after failure of standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation to treat patients with refractory ventricular fibrillation. Resuscitation 2014; 85:1337-41. [PMID 25033747]
  2. Lee YH, Lee KJ, Min YH, et al. Refractory ventricular fibrillation treated with esmolol. Resuscitation 2016; 107:150-5. [PMID 27523955]

Follow me on Twitter @mEDPharmD



Title: Subcutaneous UFH as Anticoagulation Bridge

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: anticoagulation, warfarin, heparin, bridge, DVT (PubMed Search)

Posted: 11/5/2016 by Michelle Hines, PharmD

Do you have a patient with renal insufficiency who is in need of an anticoagulation bridge to warfarin? Subcutaneous unfractionated heparin (UFH) as an initial dose of 333 Units/kg subcutaneously followed by a fixed dose of 250 Units/kg (actual body weight) every 12 hours may be an alternative to admission for heparin infusion with monitoring.

Show Additional Information

Practical Considerations:

  • UFH 20,000 Units/1 ml vial size is available – call the pharmacy to ensure it is in stock.
  • The patient will need a prescription for syringes.
  • To minimize the potential for dosing errors, it may be safest to avoid using subcutaneous UFH for outpatients >80 kg, so that only 1 vial will be used per dose (250 Units/kg x 80 kg = 20,000 Units).
  • The mean weight in a study assessing the safety and efficacy of this regimen was 82 +/- 19 kg. The mean weight in a study pharmacokinetic study comparing the peak antithrombin effect between subcutaneous UFH and low molecular weight heparins was 108 +/- 27.2 kg. 

Show References

  1. Kearon C, Ginsberg JS, Julian JA, et al. Comparison of fixed-dose weight-adjusted unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin for acute treatment of venous thromboembolism. JAMA 2006; 296:935-42. [PMID 16926353]

  2. Morris TA, Jacobson A, Marsh JJ, et al. Pharmacokinetics of UH and LMWH are similar with respect to antithrombin activity. Thromb Res 2005; 115:45-51. [PMID 15567452]

  3. Holbrook A, Schulman S, Witt DM, et al. Evidence-based management of anticoagulant therapy: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. CHEST 2012; 141(2)(Suppl):e152S-e184S. [PMID 22315259]

Follow me on Twitter @mEDPharmD



Title: Effect of QTc-prolonging agents in emergent dialysis patients with baseline QTc prolongation

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: QTc prolongation, torsades, antiemetics, antihistamines (PubMed Search)

Posted: 10/1/2016 by Michelle Hines, PharmD

What they did:

  • End stage renal disease (ESRD) patients presenting to the ED for emergent hemodialysis (HD) with baseline QTc prolongation (>450 msec in men and >470 msec in women) were given antiemetics or antihistamines for symptomatic relief of nausea and pruritis. A repeat ECG was obtained 2 hours after medications were given.
  • Most patients received oral or intravenous promethazine 25 mg, ondansetron 4-8 mg, or diphenhydramine 25-50 mg.

What they found:

  • 44 patients had a mean initial QTc of 483.7 msec (SD 18.4). Two hours after medication administration, the mean QTc was 483.8 msec (SD 20.0).
  • Among 13 patients with initial QTc intervals >500 msec, 9 had an increased QTc interval after medication administration (average increase 11.8 msec, SD 6.7 msec).
  • 8 patients with baseline QTc <500 msec had QTc >500 msec after medication administration.
  • No patients experienced dysrhythmias, death, or were admitted for dysrhythmia or syncope 1 week after medication administration.

Application to clinical practice:

  • While the mean QTc did not change, the proportion of individuals who experienced an increase in QTc interval is not reported.
  • Although greatly limited by a small sample size, this study suggests that usual doses of promethazine, ondansetron, or diphenhydramine in patients presenting for emergent HD with baseline QTc prolongation may be safe.
  • Additional studies, especially in patients with QTc prolongation >500 msec, are warranted.

Show References

Burdette S, Roppolo LP, Green W, et al. The effect of antiemetics and antihistamines on the QTc interval in emergent dialysis patients with baseline QTc prolongation. J Emerg Med 2016; 51:99-105. (PMID 27614302)

Follow me on Twitter @mEDPharmD



Title: The INCH Trial: FFP versus PCC

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: FFP,PCC,ICH,warfarin (PubMed Search)

Posted: 9/3/2016 by Michelle Hines, PharmD

Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) are used for INR reversal in patients on vitamin K antagonists (VKA) (e.g., warfarin) with life-threatening bleeding. Guidelines from the Neurocritical Care Society and Society of Critical Care Medicine recommend using PCC over FFP for patients with VKA-associated hemorrhage and an INR >=1.4.

New study-INCH trial:

  • Multi-center, prospective, randomized, open-label trial comparing FFP IV 20 ml/kg + phytonadione IV 10 mg versus 4-factor PCC IV 30 IU/kg + phytonadione IV 10 mg
  • Adult patients on VKA with intracerebral or subdural hemorrhage with INR >=2.0 were included. Patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage were excluded.

What they found:

  • Analysis included 50 (23 FFP and 27 PCC) patients (trial was stopped early after a safety analysis)
  • 2 (9%) patients in the FFP group and 18 (67%) patients in the PCC group achieved an INR <=1.2 within 3 hours (adjusted OR 30.6, 95% CI 4.7-197.9; p=0.0003)
  • Hematoma expansion at 3 hours was higher in those treated with FFP than PCC (adjusted difference 16.9 ml, 95% CI 2.5-31.3; p=0.023)
  • Time until INR <=1.2 was longer in the FFP group than the PCC group (1482 vs 40 minutes; p=0.050)

Application to clinical practice:

  • Of note, FFP 30 ml/kg has been suggested to provide more complete coagulation factor correction (this trial used 20 ml/kg), and package inserts for PCCs recommend doses based on INR and weight (this trial used 30 IU/kg for all patients)
  • Although the sample size was small, this study suggests that in patients with VKA-associated non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage and an elevated INR, PCC may provide faster INR correction than FFP, and may additionally be associated with a smaller degree of hematoma expansion.

Show References

  1. Frontera JA, Lewin JJ, Rabinstein AA, et al. Guideline for reversal of antithrombotics in intracranial hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care 2016; 24:6-46. (PMID 26714677)

  2. Steiner T, Poli S, Griebe M, et al. Fresh frozen plasma versus prothrombin complex concentrate in patients with intracranial haemorrhage related to vitamin K antagonists (INCH): a randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 2016; 15:566-73. (PMID 27302126)

Follow me on Twitter @mEDPharmD



Title: Amiodarone vs Procainamide for Stable Wide Complex Tachycardia - the PROCAMIO Study

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: amiodarone, procainamide, ventricular tachycardia (PubMed Search)

Posted: 8/6/2016 by Michelle Hines, PharmD

Amiodarone 150 mg IV over 10 minutes and procainamide IV 20-50 mg/min (up to 17 mg/kg) are two antiarrhythmic medications recommended in the American Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care for stable wide QRS complex tachycardia. [1]

What they did:

Multi-center, prospective, randomized, open-label trial comparing the incidence of major cardiac events in the acute treatment of hemodynamically stable patients with wide QRS monomorphic tachycardia (presumed to be VT) using amiodarone 5 mg/kg IV infused over 20 minutes versus procainamide 10 mg/kg IV infused over 20 minutes. [2] The study period was 40 minutes, starting from the beginning of the infusion.

What they found:

  • Analysis included 62 (n=33 procainamide, n=29 amiodarone) patients from 16 hospitals
  • Fewer patients treated with procainamide experienced major cardiac events during the study period compared to those who received amiodarone (9% vs 41%; OR =0.1, 95% CI 0.03-0.6; P=0.006). The most frequent adverse cardiac event was severe hypotension requiring electrical cardioversion.
  • Termination of VT occurred more frequently in patients treated with procainamide (67% vs 38%; OR =3.3, 95% CI 1.2-9.3; P=0.026).

Application to clinical practice:

  • Medication doses and patient weights are not reported in the results. A comparison of the doses used in the PROCAMIO study to those recommended in the AHA guidelines for a 70 kg and 100 kg patient are as follows:
    • Procainamide:
      • 70 kg patient would receive procainamide 35 mg/min for 20 minutes. This is in the middle of the dose range recommended by the AHA.
      • 100 kg patient would receive procainamide 50 mg/min for 20 minutes. This is the upper limit of the dose range recommended by the AHA.
    • Amiodarone:
      • 70 kg patient would receive amiodarone 350 mg over 20 minutes. This is approximately equal to administering 2 doses of 150 mg at the infusion rate recommended in the AHA guidelines.
      • 100 kg patient would receive amiodarone 500 mg over 20 minutes. This is approximately equal to administering 3 doses of 150 mg at an infusion rate over 1.5 times higher than that recommended in the AHA guidelines.
  • The study size was small, and depending on patient weights, it is possible that amiodarone dosing was more aggressive compared to doses commonly used in the US. However, the results suggest that procainamide could offer improved safety and efficacy over amiodarone for stable wide QRS tachycardia.

Show References

  1. Neumar RW, Otto CW, Link MS, et al. Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2010;122(Suppl. 3): S729-S767.
  2. Ortiz M, Martin A, Arribas F, et al. Randomized comparison of intravenous procainamide vs. intravenous amiodarone for the acute treatment of tolerated wide QRS tachycardia: the PROCAMIO study. Eur Hearrt J. 2016 Jun 28. Epub ahead of print. [PMID 27354046]

Follow me on Twitter (@mEDPharmD)



Title: Fluoroquinolones and risk of tendon rupture

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: fluoroquinolone, tendon rupture (PubMed Search)

Posted: 7/2/2016 by Michelle Hines, PharmD (Updated: 7/2/2016)

Fluoroquinolone antibiotics are used to treat a wide range of infections and as prophylaxis against infection in certain immune compromised patients. In 2008 the FDA issued a boxed warning for tendonitis and tendon rupture for the fluoroquinolone antibiotic class, and in May 2016 a statement recommending the use of alternate therapies for uncomplicated UTIs and upper respiratory infections was issued. The mechanism by which fluoroquinolones causes tendon injury has not been elucidated, but may be related to oxidative stress caused by the overproduction of reactive oxygen species in tenocytes.

Adverse event reporting to the FDA is performed voluntarily by healthcare professionals and consumers through MedWatch. An analysis of tendon rupture events associated with fluoroquinolone use reported to the FDA’s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database was recently published.

What they found:

  • 2495 reported cases of tendon rupture associated with fluoroquinolones
  • Most cases involved levofloxacin (n=1555), ciprofloxacin (n=606), or moxifloxacin (n=230).
  • Concomitant corticosteroids were administered in 21.2% of cases.
  • The mean age was approximately 60 +/- 5 years.
  • The ratio of men:women was 1.16:1.
  • Renal function was not reported in this study.

Application to clinical practice:

  • There is a risk of tendonitis/tendon rupture with administration of fluoroquinolone antibiotics.
  • Risk factors for fluoroquinolone-associated tendinopathies may include advanced age, impaired renal function, and use of concomitant corticosteroids.
  • Alternatives to fluoroquinolone antibiotics should be considered for patients with tendinopathy risk factors.
  • When indicated, fluoroquinolones should be used at the lowest effective dose for the shortest possible time period to minimize exposure.

Show References

  1. Arabyat RM, et al. Fluoroquinolone-associated tendon-rupture: a summary of reports in the Food and Drug Administration’s adverse event reporting system. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2015; 14:1653-60. (PMID 26393387)

  2. FDA Drug Safety Communication from 5/12/2016: http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm500143.htm

 

Follow me on Twitter (@mEDPharmD)



University of Maryland School of Medicine logo
  • Departments
  • Programs
  • Research Centers
  • Institutes
  • Graduate Education
  • CIBR Cores
  • Offices of the Dean
    • University of Maryland, Baltimore
    • University of Maryland Medical Center
    • Medical Alumni Association of the University of Maryland
    • Health Sciences and Human Services Library
University of Maryland School of Medicine
655 W. Baltimore Street
Baltimore, MD 21201
Contact Us

© University of Maryland School of Medicine

    • Webmaster
    • Web Accessibility
    • Site Index
    • UMB Hotline
    • Employment
    • Map