University of Maryland School of Medicine logo
Emergency Medicine
All Departments
UMSOM Assistant
UMEM Educational Pearls
  • Home
  • Departments
  • Emergency Medicine
  • CME
  • UMEM Educational Pearls
  • CME
  • Courses and Conferences
  • Free Open Access Medical Education
  • UMEM Educational Pearls

Search

Title: CVP and Fluid Responsiveness

Category: Critical Care

Posted: 6/25/2013 by Mike Winters, MBA, MD (Updated: 7/21/2026)

CVP and Fluid Responsiveness

  • Central venous pressure (CVP) has been used over the last 50 years to assess volume status and fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients.
  • Despite widespread practice habit, CVP has not been shown to reliably predict fluid responsiveness in the critically ill.
  • In a recent updated meta-analysis, Marik et al reviewed 43 studies, totaling over 1800 patients.
    • 57% of patients were fluid responders
    • The mean CVP was 8.2 mm Hg for fluid responders and 9.5 mm Hg for non-responders
    • For studies performed in ICU patients, the correlation coefficient for CVP and change in cardiac index was just 0.28.
  • Bottom line: Current literature does not support the use of CVP as a reliable marker of fluid responsiveness.

References

Marik PE, Cavallazzi R. Does the central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? An updated meta-analysis and a plea for some common sense. Crit Care Med 2013:41:1774-1781.


University of Maryland School of Medicine logo
  • Departments
  • Programs
  • Research Centers
  • Institutes
  • Graduate Education
  • CIBR Cores
  • Offices of the Dean
    • University of Maryland, Baltimore
    • University of Maryland Medical Center
    • Medical Alumni Association of the University of Maryland
    • Health Sciences and Human Services Library
University of Maryland School of Medicine
655 W. Baltimore Street
Baltimore, MD 21201
Contact Us

© University of Maryland School of Medicine

    • Webmaster
    • Web Accessibility
    • Site Index
    • UMB Hotline
    • Employment
    • Map