University of Maryland School of Medicine logo
Emergency Medicine
All Departments
UMSOM Assistant
UMEM Educational Pearls
  • Home
  • Departments
  • Emergency Medicine
  • CME
  • UMEM Educational Pearls
  • CME
  • Courses and Conferences
  • Free Open Access Medical Education
  • UMEM Educational Pearls

Search

21-36 of 36 results by Wesley Oliver

Previous  |  1 |  2 |  Next

Title: Pain Management in Cirrhosis

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: Cirrhosis, Pain, Acetaminophen, NSAID, Opioid (PubMed Search)

Posted: 8/1/2020 by Wesley Oliver (Updated: 7/21/2026)

The liver performs an essential role in the metabolism and clearance of many drugs. Liver damage due to cirrhosis can decrease first-pass metabolism of oral medications and increase free-drug concentrations of protein-bound medications due to decreased albumin production. In the absence of cirrhosis, patients with chronic hepatitis or hepatic cancer may only have a small decrease in drug clearance. Hepatic dose adjustments are not as prevalent or readily available as renal dose adjustments, which can create difficulty in finding the balance between pain relief and adverse effects.

The most common medications used for pain control in the emergency department are acetaminophen, NSAIDs, and opioids.

Acetaminophen

It is sometimes misconceived that acetaminophen should never be used in patients with cirrhosis due to the common knowledge that acetaminophen overdoses can cause hepatotoxicity. Alcoholics may have an increased risk of hepatotoxicity due to induction of CYP2E1 and decreased glutathione stores. However, acetaminophen is safe in patients with cirrhosis when used at appropriate doses. Limit the total daily dose of acetaminophen to 2 g daily in patients with cirrhosis and avoid acetaminophen in patients that are actively drinking.  Also, educate patients that over-the-counter (OTC) and prescription medications may contain acetaminophen.

NSAIDs

In patients with cirrhosis, NSAIDs have increased bioavailability due to decreased CYP metabolism and decreased protein binding. In addition, prostaglandin inhibition can precipitate renal failure and sodium retention, worsening ascites and increasing the risk of hepatorenal syndrome, and increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. Thrombocytopenia from NSAID use can further increase the risk of bleeding. Thus, avoid NSAID use in patients with cirrhosis. Topical NSAIDs can be considered.

Opioids

Opioid metabolism is altered in patients with cirrhosis and can contribute to complications with cirrhosis, such as precipitating encephalopathy. Generally, the bioavailability is increased and half-life is extended; thus, lower doses of immediate-release (IR) formulations at extended dosing intervals should be utilized. Common opioids for acute pain control in the emergency department are fentanyl, hydrocodone/oxycodone, hydromorphone, and morphine.

  • Fentanyl: Largely unaffected by cirrhosis. High potency so utilize only in appropriate clinical situations.
  • Hydrocodone/Oxycodone: Metabolized by CYP to active metabolites (hydromorphone/oxymorphone). Due to decreased CYP metabolism, analgesia may be less potent and clearance decreased. Also, be aware that some formulations are combined with acetaminophen.
  • Hydromorphone: Metabolized by glucuronidation to inactive metabolite. Metabolism and clearance less affected by cirrhosis.
  • Morphine: Increased bioavailability and concentration due to decreased first-pass metabolism. Decreased clearance and longer half-life. Avoid use in renal impairment and hepatorenal syndrome due to risk of neurotoxic metabolite accumulation.
  • Tramadol, codeine, meperidine, methadone, and buprenorphine not recommended for acute pain control in the emergency department.

 

 

Take Home Points

Drug/Class

Preferred Agent

Considerations

Acetaminophen

Max daily dose 2 g/day

Avoid if actively drinking. Be cautious if patient also taking OTC or combination products.

NSAIDs

None; Avoid

Topical NSAIDs may be considered.

Opioids

Hydromorphone, Fentanyl

Start with IR products at lower doses and extended intervals.

 

Show References

1. Rakoski M, Goayl P, Spencer-Safier M, Weissman J, Mohr G, Volk M. Pain management in patients with cirrhosis. Clinical Liver Disease. 2018;11:135-140.

2. Wehrer M. Pain management considerations in cirrhosis. US Pharm. 2015;40:HS5-HS11.

 



Title: Disulfiram-like Reaction with Metronidazole

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: Metronidazole, Disulfiram-like Reaction (PubMed Search)

Posted: 6/6/2020 by Wesley Oliver

While taking metronidazole it is advised that patients avoid ethanol use for at least 3 days after therapy due to the possibility of a disulfiram-like reaction.  The disulfiram-like reaction presents as abdominal cramps, nausea, vomiting, headaches, and/or flushing and can cause extreme discomfort for patients.  A recent case report describes a case of a disulfiram-like reaction in a patient receiving metronidazole and an oral prednisone solution that contained 30% alcohol.  This case highlights an important point.  Not only should we counsel patients about avoiding alcoholic beverages for at least 3 days after metronidazole therapy, but they should also avoid all alcohol-containing products, such as oral solutions and mouthwash.

 

Show References

Alonzo MM, Lewis TV, Miller JL. Disulfiram-like Reaction With Metronidazole: An Unsuspected Culprit. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2019;24:445?449. doi:10.5863/1551-6776-24.5.445
 
UpToDate [Internet]. Waltham, MA: UpToDate. 2020. Metronidazole; [2020 Jun 6]. Available from: http://www.uptodate.com/
 


Title: Anti-MRSA Therapy in Community-Onset Pneumonia

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: Pneumonia, MRSA, Antibiotics (PubMed Search)

Posted: 3/7/2020 by Wesley Oliver

Empirical Anti-MRSA vs Standard Antibiotic Therapy and Risk of 30-Day Mortality
A recent article published in JAMA Internal Medicine questioned the utility of empiric anti-MRSA pneumonia therapy.  It was a retrospective multicenter cohort study conducted in the Veteran’s Health Administration healthcare system that looked at 88,605 patients with community-onset pneumonia. They compared 30-day mortality of patients hospitalized for pneumonia receiving empirical anti-MRSA therapy plus standard therapy against standard therapy alone. Secondary outcomes analyzed development of kidney injury and secondary infections with C. difficile, VRE, or gram-negative rods. They also analyzed subgroups: ICU admission, MRSA risk factors, positive MRSA surveillance test, and positive MRSA culture on admission.

 

Anti-MRSA Therapy: Vancomycin (98%), Linezolid (2%)

Standard Therapy: Beta-lactam + macrolide/tetracycline, or respiratory fluoroquinolone

 

Outcomes
Mortality: aRR=1.4 [95% CI, 1.3-1.5]
Kidney Injury: aRR=1.4 [95% CI, 1.3-1.5]
Secondary C. difficile: aRR=1.6 [95% CI, 1.3-1.9]
Secondary VRE: aRR=1.6 [95% CI, 1.0-2.3]
Secondary gram-negative rods: aRR=1.5 [95% CI, 1.2-1.8]

 

Mortality in Subgroups

ICU: aRR=1.3 [95% CI, 1.2-1.5]

MRSA Risk Factors*: aRR=1.2 [95% CI, 1.1-1.4]

Positive MRSA Surveillance: aRR=1.6 [95% CI, 1.3-1.9]

MRSA Detected on Culture: aRR=1.1 [95% CI, 0.8-1.4]

 

*MRSA Risk Factors
-History of MRSA infection/colonization within the past year
-Or 2 of the following: previous hospitalization, nursing home residence, and previous intravenous antibiotic therapy

 

Take-Home Point

Empirical anti-MRSA therapy did not decrease mortality for any groups of patients hospitalized for pneumonia. Given that healthcare-associated pneumonia is no longer a definition supported by the IDSA/ATS, be judicious in your use of anti-MRSA therapy in community-onset pneumonia and reserve for those patients at higher risk for MRSA, such as those with post-influenza pneumonia.

Show References

Jones BE, Ying J, Stevens V, et al. Empitical anti-MRSA vs standard antibiotic therapy and risk of 30-day mortality in patients hospitalized for pneumonia [published online ahead of print, February 17, 2020]. JAMA Intern Med. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.7495.

Metlay JP, Waterer GW, Long AC, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia. An official clinical practice guideline of the American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America. Am J Resp Crit Care. 2019;200:e45-e67.

Smith C. Is Empiric Anti-MRSA Pnumonia Therapy Harmful? https://journalfeed.org/article-a-day/2020/is-empiric-anti-mrsa-pneumonia-therapy-harmful. March 4, 2020. Accessed March 6, 2020.



Title: Influenza and pneumonia: Don't forget the MRSA coverage

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: Influenza, Pneumonia, MRSA, Antibiotics (PubMed Search)

Posted: 1/4/2020 by Wesley Oliver

Influenza is a common cause of community-acquired pneumonia and invasive bacterial coinfection may occur.  In addition, secondary bacterial pneumonia due to MRSA is becoming more prevalent.  Due to the higher incidence of MRSA, it is recommended that antibiotics with activity against MRSA (vancomycin or linezolid) be included in the empiric treatment regimen, especially if the patient is critically ill.

Take Home Point: Don’t forget to add MRSA coverage to your empiric treatment regimen in those influenza patients with severe disease or secondary bacterial pneumonia.

Show References

1. Uyeki, Timothy M et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America: 2018 Update on Diagnosis, Treatment, Chemoprophylaxis, and Institutional Outbreak Management of Seasonal Influenzaa. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;68: e1-e47.

2. Metlay JP, Waterer GW, Long AC, Anzueto A, Brozek J, Crothers K, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia. An official clinical practice guideline of the American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;200:e45–e67.



Title: Simplifying Phenytoin in the ED

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: Phenytoin, Fosphenytoin (PubMed Search)

Posted: 11/2/2019 by Wesley Oliver (Updated: 11/3/2019)

Phenytoin can be a complex medication.  There are different levels than can be ordered, adjustments based on albumin, various pharmacokinetic equations, and multiple formulations.  Below are the simplified answers to some of the most common questions (see in-depth section for explanations):

Which phenytoin level (free or total) do I order?

Total Phenytoin Level.

 

What do I do after the level results?

Undetectable Level: Load patient with 20 mg/kg of total body weight (max dose 1,500 mg).

Subtherapeutic Level (<10 mcg/mL): Calculate an approximate loading dose using this equation….Phenytoin Dose (mg)=(15-measured total level)*(0.7*patient weight).

Therapeutic Level (10-20 mcg/mL): Add an additional agent.

Supratherapetutic/Toxic Level (>20 mcg/mL): Contact Poison Center (1-800-222-1222).

 

What formulation do I order for loading?

IV: Use fosphenytoin.

PO: Any formulation will work.  Give as a single loading dose or, if concerned for GI upset, give in 2-3 divided doses separated by 2 hours.

 

 

***Disclaimer: These answers are simplified for the initial management of most patients in the ED. More complex answers may be required in some situations.***

Show Additional Information

Which phenytoin level (free or total) do I order?

Total Phenytoin Level

Free and total phenytoin levels are available at most institutions. Free levels are more predictive of efficacy and toxicity; however, free levels are tested only at certain times at most institutions which can lead to a delay in results. Total phenytoin levels are a good approximation of therapeutic levels and are easier to perform pharmacokinetic caculations.

 

What do I do after the level results?

Undetectable Level: Load patient with 20 mg/kg of total body weight (max dose 1,500 mg)

For phenytoin naive or noncompliant patients that present with an undetectable level, the guideline recommended loading dose is phenytoing 20 mg/kg.

 

Subtherapeutic Level (<10 mcg/mL): Calculate an approximate loading dose using this equation….Phenytoin Dose (mg)=(15-measured total level)*(0.7*patient weight)

Phenytoin has many complex equations related to the pharmacokinetics of the medication.  There are adjustments for albumin, approximations of free/total levels, estimations of loading doses, etc.  A simple PK equation that can be applied to most medications is concentration=(dose*salt factor)/(volume of distribution).  For application to clinical cases with phenytoin this equation can be manipulated to yield the dose=(desired concentration-measured concentration)*(population Vd*patient weight).

 

For the equation given to you above, this equation has modified.  The equation was manipulated to solve for dose.  The salt correction factor was removed.  For phenytoin the salt correction factor is 0.92, thus removing it does not significantly affect the results.  There are also two variables of the equation that are prepopulated.  Therapeutic levels of phosphenytoin are 10-20 mcg/mL.  A simplified desired concentration is to aim for the middle concentration of 15 mcg/mL.  The population Vd is a range; however, we use 0.7 L/kg for ease of caculations.

 

Therapeutic Level (10-20 mcg/mL): Add an additional agent

There is no therapeutic benefit to giving additional phenytoin in these patients.  Phenytoin has complex pharmacokinetics and giving patient additional phenytoin will likely lead to phenytoin toxicity.

 

Supratherapetutic/Toxic Level (>20 mcg/mL): Contact Poison Center (1-800-222-1222)

Experts in toxicology are available 24/7 to assist in the managment of patients with phenytoin toxicity.

 

What formulation do I order for loading?

IV: Use fosphenytoin

For initial IV loading, fosphenytoin (a prodrug of phenytoin) is preferred.  Compared to phenytoin, fosphenytoin can be administer faster, has less side effects, and does not require a filter for administration; making fosphenytoin the preferred product.  Fosphenytoin is doses in phenytoin equivalents (PE) to prevent confusion with dosing.

 

PO: Any formulation will work.  Give as a single loading dose or, if concerned for GI upset, give in divided doses separated by 2 hours.

Any oral formulation of phenytoin (immediate release, extended release, oral solution) is appropriate for oral loading of phenytoin. There is evidence supporting a single oral loading dose of phenytoin can be tolerated; however, due to historical guidance of limiting the oral dose to <400 mg and separating doses by 2 hours due to concern for absorption and potential for GI upset some providers may find a single dose controversial. An alternative method is to divide the total phenytoin dose into 2-3 doses and administer separated by 2 hours for each dose.

Show References

1. Abernethy DR, Greenblatt DJ. Phenytoin disposition in obesity. Determination of loading dose. Arch Neurol. 1985;42(5):468-71.

2. Anderson GD, Pak C, Doane KW, et al. Revised Winter-Tozer equation for normalized phenytoin concentrations in trauma and elderly patients with hypoalbuminemia. Ann Pharmacother. 1997;31(3):279-84.

3, Glauser T, Shinnar S, Gloss D, et al. Evidence-Based Guideline: Treatment of Convulsive Status Epilepticus in Children and Adults: Report of the Guideline Committee of the American Epilepsy Society. Epilepsy Curr. 2016;16(1):48–61. doi:10.5698/1535-7597-16.1.48

4. Kane SP, Bress AP, Tesoro EP. Characterization of unbound phenytoin concentrations in neurointensive care unit patients using a revised Winter-Tozer equation. Ann Pharmacother. 2013;47(5):628-36.

5. Osborn HH, Zisfein J, Sparano R. Single-dose oral phenytoin loading. Ann Emerg Med. 1987;16(4):407-12.

6. Ratanakorn D, Kaojarern S, Phuapradit P, Mokkhavesa C. Single oral loading dose of phenytoin: a pharmacokinetics study. J Neurol Sci. 1997;147(1):89-92.

7. Soriano VV, Tesoro EP, Kane SP. Characterization of Free Phenytoin Concentrations in End-Stage Renal Disease Using the Winter-Tozer Equation. Ann Pharmacother. 2017 May 1.

8. Winter MG, Tozer TN. Chapter 25. Phenytoin. In: Evans WE, Schentag JJ, Jusko WJ. Applied pharmacokinetics: principles of therapeutic drug monitoring. 3rd ed. Vancouver, WA: Applied Therapeutics, 1992:1-44.



Title: Too Much Acid in the Blood: Euglycemic Diabetic Ketoacidosis

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: DKA, SGLT2 Inhibitors (PubMed Search)

Posted: 8/3/2019 by Wesley Oliver (Updated: 7/21/2026)

The American Diabetes Association requires a plasma glucose concentration greater than 250 mg/dL to diagnose diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA).  However, with the new diabetic agents this is not always the case. With the introduction of SGLT2 inhibitors (canagliflozin [Invokana], dapagliflozin [Farxiga], empagliflozin [Jardiance]) there have been reported cases of DKA and patients being euglycemic. 

 

Take Home Point

Patients with a low/normal blood glucose can still have DKA.  Especially if they are taking newer medications, such as the SGLT2 inhibitors.

 
 

Show References

AE Kitabchi, GE Umpierrez, JM Miles, JN Fisher. Hyperglycemic Crises in Adult Patients With Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009;32:1335-1343.


U.S Food and Drug Administration. FDA warns that SGLT2 inhibitors for diabetes may result in a serious condition of too much acid in the blood. https://www.fda.gov/media/92185/download. Accessed August 3, 2019.



Title: Alteplase for Pulmonary Embolism

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: alteplase, pulmonary embolism (PubMed Search)

Posted: 7/6/2019 by Wesley Oliver

Alteplase may be considered in some patients with a presumed or confirmed pulmonary embolism.  Below is a list of the different patient populations and the associated alteplase dosing.

-Hemodynamically Stable/Submassive: Alteplase usually not indicated.

-Hemodynamically Unstable/Massive: Alteplase IV 100 mg as an infusion over 2 hours.

-Cardiac Arrest: Alteplase IV/IO 50 mg bolus over 2 minutes.  Can repeat a second 50 mg bolus 15 minutes later if unable to achieve return of spontaneous circulation.

Show References

Alteplase. Lexicomp. UpToDate. Waltham, MA: UpToDate Inc. Available at: https://www.uptodate.com. Accessed on July 6, 2019.

 

Kearon C, Aki EA, Comerota AJ, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2012;141:e419-e496S.

 

Kearon C, Aki EA, Ornelas J, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest 2016;149:315-352.

 

Lavonas EJ, Drennan IR, Gabrielli A, et al. Part 10: Special circumstances of resuscitation: 2015 American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2015;132:S501-S518.

 


Title: "SHIVERS": Signs and Symptoms of Serotonin Syndrome (Contribution by Kortney Morrell, PharmD)

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: Serotonin Syndrome, SHIVERS (PubMed Search)

Posted: 4/6/2019 by Wesley Oliver

Identifying serotonin syndrome in the emergency department can be difficult without an accurate patient history. Furthermore, the physical symptoms may look similar to many other disorders such as neuroleptic malignant syndrome and anticholinergic toxicity. If you remember the acronym SHIVERS, you can easily recognize the signs and symptoms of serotonin syndrome.

Shivering: Neuromuscular symptom that is unique to serotonin syndrome

Hyperreflexia and Myoclonus: Seen in mild to moderate cases. Most prominent in the lower extremities. This can help differentiate from neuroleptic malignant syndrome which would present with lead-pipe rigidity.

Increased Temperature: Not always present, but usually observed in more severe cases

Vital Sign Abnormalities: Tachycardia, tachypnea, and labile blood pressure

Encephalopathy: Mental status changes such as agitation, delirium, and confusion

Restlessness: Common due to excess serotonin activity

Sweating: Autonomic response to excess serotonin. This symptom can help differentiate from anticholinergic toxicity in which the patients would present with increased temperature but dry to the touch

Once serotonin syndrome is identified, it is important to discontinue all serotonergic agents, provide supportive care with fluids, and sedate with benzodiazepines. Sedation with benzodiazepines helps to decrease myoclonic jerks which also helps with temperature control. If patients are hyperthermic, they will require intensive cooling. Cyproheptadine, a potent antihistamine and serotonin antagonist, should also be administered. The initial dose of cyproheptadine in serotonin syndrome is 12mg which can be followed by 2 mg every 2 hours as needed for symptom control.

Show References

1.     Christensin RC. Get serotonin syndrome down with cold shivers. [Internet] 2006 [cited 2019 Apr 4]. Available from: https://mdedge-files-live.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/files/s3fs-public/Document/September-2017/0502CP_Pearls2.pdf

2.     Ables AZ, Nagubilli R. Prevention, Recognition, and Management of Serotonin Syndrome. AFP. 2010;81(9):1139-1142.

 


Title: Flu Season is Upon Us: Treatment with Oseltamivir

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: Flu, Treatment, Oseltamivir (PubMed Search)

Posted: 1/8/2019 by Wesley Oliver (Updated: 7/21/2026)

---Early antiviral treatment can shorten the duration of fever and illness symptoms, and may reduce the risk of some complications from influenza.

---Early treatment of hospitalized adult influenza patients with oseltamivir has been reported to reduce death in some observational studies.

---Clinical benefit is greatest when antiviral treatment is administered within 48 hours of influenza illness onset.

 

Antiviral treatment is recommended for patients with confirmed or suspected influenza who:

---are hospitalized;

---have severe, complicated, or progressive illness; or

---are at higher risk for influenza complications. (See below for in-depth information)

Oral oseltamivir is the recommended antiviral for patients with severe, complicated, or progressive illness who are not hospitalized, and for hospitalized influenza patients.

 

Treatment:

Doses: Oseltamivir 75 mg twice daily

Renal Impairment Dosing

CrCl >60 mL/minute: No dosage adjustment necessary

CrCl >30 to 60 mL/minute: 30 mg twice daily

CrCl >10 to 30 mL/minute: 30 mg once daily

ESRD undergoing dialysis: 30 mg immediately and then 30 mg after every hemodialysis session

 

Duration of Treatment:

Recommended duration for antiviral treatment is 5 days for oral oseltamivir. Longer daily dosing can be considered for patients who remain severely ill after 5 days of treatment.

Show Additional Information

People at higher risk for influenza complications recommended for antiviral treatment include:

---children younger than 2 years;

---adults 65 years and older;

---people with chronic pulmonary (including asthma), cardiovascular (except hypertension alone), renal, hepatic, hematological (including sickle cell disease), and metabolic disorders (including diabetes mellitus), or neurologic and neurodevelopment conditions (including disorders of the brain, spinal cord, peripheral nerve, and muscle, such as cerebral palsy, epilepsy [seizure disorders], stroke, intellectual disability, moderate to severe developmental delay, muscular dystrophy, or spinal cord injury);

---people with immunosuppression, including that caused by medications or by HIV infection;

---women who are pregnant or postpartum (within 2 weeks after delivery);

---people younger than 19 years old who are receiving long-term aspirin- or salicylate-containing medications

---American Indians/Alaska Natives;

---people who are extremely obese (i.e., body mass index is equal to or greater than 40); and

---residents of nursing homes and other chronic care facilities.

Show References

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Influenza antiviral medications: summary for clinicians. https://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/antivirals/summary-clinicians.htm (Accessed on January 8, 2019).

 



Title: Intranasal Administration of Common Emergency Department Medications

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: Intranasal Administration, Alternative Administration (PubMed Search)

Posted: 11/3/2018 by Wesley Oliver (Updated: 11/8/2018)

The most common methods of medication administration in the emergency department are oral, intravenous (IV), and intramuscular (IM).  If the oral route is not available, if IV/IM are not necessary, or if obtaining IV access is challenging, intranasal (IN) medication delivery is a reasonable alternative.  More concentrated products are preferred and a volume of 1 mL or less per nostril should be utilized.  Below is a table of the commonly used medications used via the IN route. 

Drug Concentration Indication IN Dose

Time to Peak Effect

Adverse Events
Fentanyl 50 mcg/mL Analgesia 0.5-2 mcg/kg 5 min

Nasal irritation, rhinitis, headache

Ketamine 100 mg/mL

Analgesia, Agitation, Sedation

3-6 mg/kg 5-10 min

Poor taste, HTN, hypersalivation, agitation, emergence reaction

Lorazepam 2 mg/mL

Agitation, Seizures

0.1 mg/kg

Max: 4 mg

30 min

Poor taste, lacrimation, nasal/throat irritation

Midazolam 5 mg/mL

Agitation, Sedation, Seizures

0.1-0.4 mg/kg

Max: 10 mg

5-10 min Same as lorazepam
Naloxone 1 mg/mL

Opioid Reversal

0.1 mg/kg

Usual dose:

0.4-2 mg

1-5 min

N/V, headache, withdrawal symptoms

 

Show References

Bailey AM, Baum RA, Horn K, et al. Review of intranasally administered medications for use in the emergency department. J Emerg Med. 2017;53:38-48.



Title: Order of antibiotic administration can affect compliance with CMS sepsis measure

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: Sepsis, Antibiotics, CMS, Core Measures (PubMed Search)

Posted: 9/1/2018 by Wesley Oliver

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) require broad spectrum antibiotics to be administered within 3 hours of presentation of sepsis to be in compliance with the sepsis measure. 

 

Not only do the antibiotics that are chosen determine compliance with this measure, but the order in which antibiotics are given can also significantly affect compliance. 

 

According to CMS, for combination antibiotic therapy, both antibiotics must be started within the three hours following presentation; however, they do not need to be completely infused within this time frame. 

 

Combination therapy typically includes a monotherapy antibiotic (see list in detailed information below) plus vancomycin (daptomycin or linezolid could also be used). 

 

So which antibiotic should be given first? 

 

If a monotherapy antibiotic is given first within the 3 hours of presentation, then compliance for the sepsis measure is met.  These antibiotics cover a broader range of bacteria and are typically infused over ~30 minutes, which allows plenty of time for your second antibiotic to be initiated.  

 

If vancomycin is given first, compliance with this measure can become difficult. First, vancomycin has a narrower spectrum of activity and is not a monotherapy antibiotic. Second, vancomycin infusion rates range from 1 to 2 hours.  Given that antibiotics are usually given after sepsis is flagged, this infusion rate only gives a short period of time for the second antibiotic to be initiated. Thus, vancomycin should almost always be the second antibiotic infused. 

 

In addition, patients may also have limited intravenous access or antibiotics may not be compatible with resuscitation fluids.  All of these factors together must be considered when trying to gain compliance with this measure. 

 

Take-Home Point: 

Administer monotherapy antibiotics (e.g. piperacillin/tazobactam and cefepime) prior to administering vancomycin in your septic patients to improve compliance with the sepsis measure. 

 
 

 

Show Additional Information

Antibiotic Monotherapy Selection
  • Doripenem
  • Ertapenem
  • Imipenem/cilastatin
  • Meropenem
  • Cefotaxime
  • Ceftazidime
  • Ceftriaxone
  • Cefepime
  • Ceftaroline
  • Moxifloxacin
  • Gatifloxacin
  • Amoxicillin/clavulanate
  • Ampicillin/sulbactam
  • Piperacillin/tazobactam
  • Ticarcillin/clavulanate

 

Show References

Specifications Manual for National Hospital Inpatient Quality Measures v5.4. The Joint Commission. https://www.jointcommission.org/specifications_manual_for_national_hospital_inpatient_quality_measures.aspx. Updated December 29, 2017.  Accessed August 31, 2018. 



Title: New-Onset Diabetes with DKA in Adults

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: Diabetes, DKA (PubMed Search)

Posted: 7/7/2018 by Wesley Oliver (Updated: 7/21/2026)

Pearl submitted by James Leonard, PharmD, Clinical Toxicology Fellow
 
A 54-year-old male 1-year post-renal transplant arrives to the emergency department in diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). He has no history of diabetes and is not currently taking steroids for immunosuppression. Home medications include tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and hydrochlorothiazide. Is this latent auto-immune diabetes or something else?
 

Show Additional Information

This presentation is likely tacrolimus-associated post-transplant diabetes.
 
Tacrolimus has been associated with a 43.1% incidence of new-onset diabetes after transplant (NODAT) within 3 years after transplant, with most patients experiencing NODAT within 1-year post-transplant. NODAT can even occur with short-term steroid use (e.g., intraoperative bolus alone). While the mechanism is not 100% clear, it is thought to be due to increased insulin resistance and/or a direct toxic effect on the pancreas.
 
The management of DKA does not change based on the etiology. Long-term management of diabetes in these patients is also similar.

Show References

Woodward RS, Flore MC, Machnicki G, Brennan DC. The long-term outcomes and costs of diabetes mellitus among renal transplant recipients: tacrolimus versus cyclosporine. Value Health. 2011;14(4):443-9.



Title: Fosfomycin for UTIs

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: Fosfomycin, urinary tract infection, cystitis (PubMed Search)

Posted: 3/3/2018 by Wesley Oliver

Fosfomycin is an antibiotic infrequently used for the treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs). It has a broad spectrum of activity that covers both gram-positive (MRSA, VRE) and gram-negative bacteria (Pseudomonas, ESBL, and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae), which is useful in the treatment of multidrug-resistant bacteria. 

Fosfomycin is FDA approved for the treatment of uncomplicated UTIs in women due to susceptible strains of Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis (3g oral as a single dose). Data has also demonstrated that it can be used for complicated UTIs; however, dosing is different in this population (3 g oral every 2-3 days for 3 doses).  Fosfomycin is not recommended for pyelonephritis.

The broad spectrum of activity, in addition to only needing a single dose in most cases, makes fosfomycin an attractive option; however, it should be reserved for use in certain circumstances.  Fosfomycin should not be considered as a first-line option.  It is also more expensive than other medications (~$100/dose) and in countries with high rates of utilization bacteria are developing resistance to fosfomycin.  In addition, most outpatient pharmacies do not keep this medication in stock.

Take-Home Point:

Fosfomycin should be reserved for multidrug-resistant UTIs in which other first-line options have been exhausted.

Show References

  1. Gupta K, Hooton TM, Naber KG, et al; Infectious Diseases Society of America; European Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. International clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of acute uncomplicated cystitis and pyelonephritis in women: a 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the European Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(5): e103-e120. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciq257.

  2. Michalopoulos AS, Livaditis IG, Gougoutas V. The revival of fosfomycin. Int J Infect Dis. 2011;15(11):e732-e739. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2011.07.007.

  3. MONUROL [prescribing information]. St. Louis, MO: Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc; 2007. www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2008/050717s005lbl.pdf. Accessed 9/7/2017September 7, 2017.

  4. Oteo J, Bautista V, Lara N, et al; Spanish ESBL-EARS-Net Study Group. Parallel increase in community use of fosfomycin and resistance to fosfomycin in extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65(11):2459-2463. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq346.

  5. Raz R. Fosfomycin: an old—new antibiotic. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(1): 4-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03636.x

  6. Reffert JL, Smith WJ. Fosfomycin for the treatment of resistant gram-negative bacterial infections. Insights from the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Pharmacotherapy. 2014;34(8):845-857. doi: 10.1002/phar.1434.

  7. Vardakas KZ, Legakis NJ, Triarides N, Falagas ME. Susceptibility of contemporary isolates to fosfomycin: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2016;47(4):269-285. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.02.001.

  8. Wankum, Michael, et al. “Fosfomycin Use.” Pharmacy Times, 30 Nov. 2017, www.pharmacytimes.com/publications/health-system-edition/2017/november2017/fosfomycin-use.

 



Title: Subcutaneous (SubQ) vs. Intramuscular (IM) Epinephrine in Asthma Exacerbations

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: Epinephrine, Asthma (PubMed Search)

Posted: 1/8/2018 by Wesley Oliver

Patients with severe asthma exacerbations that are unresponsive to inhaled beta-agonists may require the use of epinephrine to control their symptoms.  When patients get to this point what route of administration should be used for the administration of epinephrine?

The most recent asthma guidelines (published in 2007) recommend the use of SubQ epinephrine 0.3-0.5 mg every 20 minutes for 3 doses.  Drug references typically list SubQ or IM epinephrine 0.01 mg/kg (~0.3-0.5 mg) every 20 minutes as appropriate routes of administration.  There is currently no data demonstrating that one route of administration is better than the other in patients with asthma; however, in other disease states, such as anaphylaxis, IM epinephrine is preferred due to the more rapid and reliable absorption over SubQ administration.

Auto-injectors that administer IM epinephrine 0.3 mg are available.  These auto-injectors may decrease the risk of medications error; however, they can be expensive.  SubQ administration requires the use of a syringe and a vial/ampule of 1 mg/mL epinephrine.

Bottom Line: Either SubQ or IM epinephrine administration is appropriate for patients with severe asthma exacerbations.  The preferred method at a given institution will be dictated by historical practice, risk of medication dosing errors, and drug cost.

Show Additional Information

Show References

1. National Asthma Education and Prevention Program, Third Expert Panel on the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. Expert Panel Report 3: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. Bethesda (MD): National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (US); 2007 Aug. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK7232/

2.Simons FER, Ardusso LRF, Bilo MB, El-Gamal YM, Ledford DK, Ring J, et al. World Allergy Organization Anaphylaxis Guidelines: Summary. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;127(3):587–93. e1-e20.



Title: Insulin for Hyperkalemia

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: Insulin, Hyperkalemia, Dextrose (PubMed Search)

Posted: 11/6/2017 by Wesley Oliver (Updated: 7/21/2026)

Strategies for Hyperkalemia Management

Stabilize cardiac membrane

Calcium gluconate

Intracellular movement in skeletal muscles

Albuterol

Sodium Bicarbonate

Insulin

Potassium excretion

Loop Diuretics

Kayexalate

Patiromer (chronic use only)

Potassium removal

Dialysis

 

Insulin mechanism of action for hyperkalemia:

· Binds to skeletal muscle receptors

· Increased activity of the sodium-potassium adenosine triphosphatase and glucose transporter GLUT4

· Glycemic response occurs at lower levels of insulin

· Potassium transport activity increases as insulin levels increase

Patients with insulin resistance due to type-2 diabetes do not become resistant to the kalemic effects of insulin.

 

Hypoglycemia following insulin administration for hyperkalemia:

· Occurs 1-3 hours post dose, even with initial bolus of dextrose

· The amount of glucose is insufficient to replace the glucose utilized in response to the administered dose of insulin

· Insulin’s half-life is increased in ESRD leading to longer duration of action

 

A systematic review of 11 studies regarding insulin dosing for hyperkalemia:

· 22 patients (18%) experienced hypoglycemia

· Studies that only gave 25 grams (1 amp) of dextrose had the highest incidence of hypoglycemia (30%)

 

Tips:

· Consider insulin dose reduction in patients with renal failure

· Use an order set to ensure patients receive appropriate POC glucose monitoring to detect delayed onset of hypoglycemia

· Dextrose 50% (25 grams) should be given to all patients with pre-insulin BG <350 mg/dL

Subsequent PRN dextrose 50% (25 grams) should be used to maintain BG >100 mg/dL after insulin administration

Show References

References:

1. Sterns RH, Grieff M, Bernstein PL. Treatment of hyperkalemia: something old, something new. Kidney International 2016;89(3):5460554.

2. Harel Z, Kamel KS (2016) Optimal Dose and Method of Administration of Intravenous Insulin in the Management of Emergency Hyperkalemia: A Systematic Review. PLoS ONE 11(5): e0154963. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0154963



Title: Alpha-Blockers for the Management of Ureteral Stones

Category: Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Keywords: Ureteral stones, Alpha-blockers (PubMed Search)

Posted: 9/2/2017 by Wesley Oliver (Updated: 7/21/2026)

Alpha-blockers (tamsulosin, alfuzosin, doxazosin, and terazosin) are antagonists of alpha1A-adrenoreceptors, which results in the relaxation of ureteral smooth muscle.    Current evidence suggests alpha-blockers may be useful when ureteral stones are 5-10 mm; however, there is no evidence to support the use of alpha-blockers with stones <5 mm.  Patients with ureteral stones >10 mm were excluded from studies utilizing these medications.

The size of most ureteral stones will be unknown due to the lack of need for imaging able to measure stone size. Given that the median ureteral stone size is <5 mm, most patients will not benefit from the use of an alpha-blocker.

Also, keep in mind that the data for adverse events with alpha-blockers used for ureteral stones is limited and that these medications have a risk of hypotension.

 

Show Additional Information

Ferre RM et al. Tamsulosin for ureteral stones in the emergency department: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med 2009.

  • 77 patients

  • Ibuprofen + oxycodone + tamsulosin vs. ibuprofen + oxycodone

  • Stone expulsion at 14 days: Tamsulosin group=77.1% vs. Standard therapy=64.9%

-Difference=12% (95% CI: -8.4-32.8%)

  • No clinically/statistically significant differences

 

Pickard R et al. Medical expulsive therapy in adults with ureteric colic: a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2015.

  • 1,136 patients

  • Tamsulosin vs. nifedipine vs. placebo

  • No further intervention at 4 weeks: Tamsulosin=81% vs. Nifedipine=80% vs. Placebo=80%

  • No clinically/statistically significant differences

 

Furyk JS et al. Distal ureteric stones and tamsulosin: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter trial. Ann Emerg Med 2016.

  • 403 patients

  • Tamsulosin vs. placebo

  • Stone passage at 28 days: Tamsulosin=87% vs. Placebo=81.9%

-Difference=5% (95% CI: -3-13%)

  • Found difference in subgroup analysis of large stones (5-10 mm)

-Tamsulosin=83.3% vs. Placebo=61%

-Difference=22.4% (95% CI: 3.1-41.6%)

  • No other clinically/statistically significant differences

 

Hollingsworth JM et al. Alpha blockers for treatment of ureteric stones: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2016.

  • Meta-analysis of 55 trials

  • No benefit in patients with smaller stones (<5 mm): RR=1.19 (95% CI: 1.00-1.98)

  • Benefit in patients with larger stones (5-10 mm): RR=1.57 (95% CI: 1.39-1.61)

Show References

1.) Ferre RM, Wasielewski JN, Strout TD, Perron AD. Tamsulosin for ureteral stones in the emergency department: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med 2009;54:432-9.

2.) Furyk JS, Chu K, Banks C, et al. Distal ureteric stones and tamsulosin: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter trial. Ann Emerg Med 2016;67:86-95.

3.) Hollingsworth JM, Canales BK, Rogers MAM, et al. Alpha blockers for treatment of ureteric stones: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2016;355:i6112.

4.) Pickard R, Starr K, MacLennan G, et al. Medical expulsive therapy in adults with ureteric colic: a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2015;386:341-9.

 


Previous  |  1 |  2 |  Next
University of Maryland School of Medicine logo
  • Departments
  • Programs
  • Research Centers
  • Institutes
  • Graduate Education
  • CIBR Cores
  • Offices of the Dean
    • University of Maryland, Baltimore
    • University of Maryland Medical Center
    • Medical Alumni Association of the University of Maryland
    • Health Sciences and Human Services Library
University of Maryland School of Medicine
655 W. Baltimore Street
Baltimore, MD 21201
Contact Us

© University of Maryland School of Medicine

    • Webmaster
    • Web Accessibility
    • Site Index
    • UMB Hotline
    • Employment
    • Map