University of Maryland School of Medicine logo
Emergency Medicine
All Departments
UMSOM Assistant
UMEM Educational Pearls
  • Home
  • Departments
  • Emergency Medicine
  • CME
  • UMEM Educational Pearls
  • CME
  • Courses and Conferences
  • Free Open Access Medical Education
  • UMEM Educational Pearls

Search

Title: Cardiac Arrest During Interfacility EMS transport

Category: EMS

Keywords: SADS, cardiac arrest (PubMed Search)

Posted: 7/15/2026 by Jenny Guyther, MD (Updated: 7/15/2026)

This study by Peters et al. (2026), published in Prehospital Emergency Care, is the first nationwide analysis of cardiac arrest occurring during interfacility transport (IFT) by EMS, finding that critical care transport (CCT) was associated with more than double the odds of ROSC compared to ALS (aOR 2.21, 95% CI 1.42–3.48), while BLS care was associated with significantly worse outcomes.

Overall ROSC rate: 50.3% — broken down as 32.9% (BLS), 45.3% (ALS), and 59.5% (CCT)

Additional Information

From over 54 million EMS encounters, they identified 1,466 cases where cardiac arrest was witnessed by the transporting EMS crew during an IFT.

Key Descriptive Findings

Level of care distribution: 7.5% BLS, 53.6% ALS, 38.9% CCT

Median age: 64 years (IQR 50–75); CCT patients were younger (median 61) than BLS (70) or ALS (66)

22.2% had a shockable initial rhythm

11.8% were trauma-associated

9.2% had a prior cardiac arrest before re-arresting during IFT — most commonly in the CCT group (14.9%), reflecting the higher acuity of patients selected for CCT

58.1% were transported by ground; 38.2% by rotor wing; 3.7% by fixed wing

14.7% involved a mechanical CPR device

Unshockable Rhythm Subgroup Analysis

A particularly notable finding was that the CCT advantage persisted — and was even more pronounced — in patients with unshockable initial rhythms (PEA/asystole):

CCT vs. ALS: aOR 2.65 (95% CI 1.64–4.33)

BLS vs. ALS: aOR 0.47 (95% CI 0.21–1.03, borderline non-significant)

Ground vs. air: aOR 0.61 (95% CI 0.38–0.97)

The authors hypothesize this reflects CCT clinicians' ability to titrate multiple vasopressors — particularly important for managing pseudo-PEA associated with profound hypotension — as well as the benefit of having a second clinician in the patient compartment enabling parallel task completion and redundant monitoring.

References

Peters, G. A., Misra, A. J., Samadian, K. D., Chang, W., Chandran, K. G., Hurwitz, J. A., … Cash, R. E. (2026). Cardiac Arrest During Interfacility Transport with Emergency Medical Services: A Preliminary Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study. Prehospital Emergency Care, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2026.2690618


University of Maryland School of Medicine logo
  • Departments
  • Programs
  • Research Centers
  • Institutes
  • Graduate Education
  • CIBR Cores
  • Offices of the Dean
    • University of Maryland, Baltimore
    • University of Maryland Medical Center
    • Medical Alumni Association of the University of Maryland
    • Health Sciences and Human Services Library
University of Maryland School of Medicine
655 W. Baltimore Street
Baltimore, MD 21201
Contact Us

© University of Maryland School of Medicine

    • Webmaster
    • Web Accessibility
    • Site Index
    • UMB Hotline
    • Employment
    • Map